Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21632064›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychiatric research2011

The treatment of minor depression with St. John's Wort or citalopram: failure to show benefit over placebo.

Mark Hyman Rapaport, Andrew A Nierenberg, Robert Howland, Christina Dording, Pamela J Schettler, David Mischoulon

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychiatric research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Documentary Analysis ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Should antidepressants be used in minor depression?Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark Hyman RapaportDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. mark.rapaport@cshs.org
Andrew A Nierenberg
Robert Howland
Christina Dording
Pamela J Schettler
David Mischoulon
Massachusetts General Hospital · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Pharmacotherapy for Minor DepressionR01MH061757 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI RAPAPORT, MARK HYMAN · 2001 to 2004
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R0-1MH61757NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents new data addressing two important controversies in psychiatry: the construct of Minor Depression (MinD) and the efficacy of St. John's Wort for milder forms of depressive disorders. Data are from a three-arm, 12 week, randomized clinical trial of investigating the efficacy of St. John's Wort (810 mg/day), citalopram (20 mg/day), or placebo for acute treatment of MinD. Due to a high placebo response on all outcome measures, neither St. John's Wort nor citalopram separated from placebo on change in depressive symptom severity, quality of life, or well-being. However, systematic assessment of potential adverse effects (AEs) led to three important observations: (1) prior to the administration of study compound, 60% of subjects endorsed items that would be characterized as AEs once study compound was administered, (2) St. John's Wort and citalopram were each associated with a significant number of new or worsening AEs during treatment, and (3) using a structured interview for identifying AEs at baseline and during treatment is informative. MinD was not responsive to either a conventional antidepressant or a nutraceutical, and both compounds were associated with a notable side effects burden. Other treatment approaches for MinD should be investigated.

Indexed as

HypericumPhytotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsQuality of LifeYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID21632064
PMCPMC3137264
OpenAlexW2079524807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.