Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21631481›Full record

ArticleHeadache2011

Direct costs of preventive headache treatments: comparison of behavioral and pharmacologic approaches.

Allison M Schafer, Jeanetta C Rains, Donald B Penzien, Leanne Groban, Todd A Smitherman, Timothy T Houle

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Treatment of PTSD and Chronic Daily Headache.Current treatment options in neurology · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Allison M SchaferDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Jeanetta C Rains
Donald B Penzien
Leanne Groban
Todd A Smitherman
Timothy T Houle
Elliot Hospital · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Physiological Arousal and HeadacheR01NS065257 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOULE, TIMOTHY T · 2009 to 2018
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study provides preliminary data and a framework to facilitate cost comparisons for pharmacologic vs behavioral approaches to headache prophylactic treatment.

backgroundThere are few empirical demonstrations of cumulative costs for pharmacologic and behavioral headache treatments, and there are no direct comparisons of short- and long-range (5-year) costs for pharmacologic vs behavioral headache treatments.

methodsTwo separate pilot surveys were distributed to a convenience sample of behavioral specialists and physicians identified from the membership of the American Headache Society. Costs of prototypical regimens for preventive pharmacologic treatment (PPT), clinic-based behavioral treatment (CBBT), minimal contact behavioral treatment (MCBT), and group behavioral treatment were assessed. Each survey addressed total cost accumulated during treatment (ie, intake, professional fees) excluding costs of acute medications. The total costs of preventive headache therapy by type of treatment were then evaluated and compared over time.

resultsDuring the initial months of treatment, PPT with inexpensive mediations (<0.75 $/day) represents the least costly regimen and is comparable to MCBT in expense until 6 months. After 6 months, PPT is expected to become more costly, particularly when medication cost exceeds 0.75$ a day. When using an expensive medication (>3 $/day), preventive drug treatment becomes more expensive than CBBT after the first year. Long-term, and within year 1, MCBT was found to be the least costly approach to migraine prevention.

conclusionsThrough year 1 of treatment, inexpensive prophylactic medications (such as generically available beta-blocker or tricyclic antidepressant medications) and behavioral interventions utilizing limited delivery formats (MCBT) are the least costly of the empirically validated interventions. This analysis suggests that, relative to pharmacologic options, limited format behavioral interventions are cost-competitive in the early phases of treatment and become more cost-efficient as the years of treatment accrue.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysHealth ExpendituresAnalgesicsBehavior TherapyCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug CostsHeadacheHumansPoloxaleneAnalgesicsPoloxalene

Identifiers

PMID21631481
PMCPMC3303196
OpenAlexW2080577003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.