Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21629586›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2010

A method for the estimation of functional brain connectivity from time-series data.

A Wilmer, M H E de Lussanet, M Lappe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. How much time has passed? Ask your heart.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A WilmerDeptartment of Psychology, Westf. Wilhelms-University, Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience (OCC), Münster, Germany.
M H E de Lussanet
M Lappe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central issue in cognitive neuroscience is which cortical areas are involved in managing information processing in a cognitive task and to understand their temporal interactions. Since the transfer of information in the form of electrical activity from one cortical region will in turn evoke electrical activity in other regions, the analysis of temporal synchronization provides a tool to understand neuronal information processing between cortical regions. We adopt a method for revealing time-dependent functional connectivity. We apply statistical analyses of phases to recover the information flow and the functional connectivity between cortical regions for high temporal resolution data. We further develop an evaluation method for these techniques based on two kinds of model networks. These networks consist of coupled Rössler attractors or of coupled stochastic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck systems. The implemented time-dependent coupling includes uni- and bi-directional connectivities as well as time delayed feedback. The synchronization dynamics of these networks are analyzed using the mean phase coherence, based on averaging over phase-differences, and the general synchronization index. The latter is based on the Shannon entropy. The combination of these with a parametric time delay forms the basis of a connectivity pattern, which includes the temporal and time lagged dynamics of the synchronization between two sources. We model and discuss potential artifacts. We find that the general phase measures are remarkably stable. They produce highly comparable results for stochastic and periodic systems. Moreover, the methods proves useful for identifying brief periods of phase coupling and delays. Therefore, we propose that the method is useful as a basis for generating potential functional connective models.

Indexed as

Functional connectivityMEG magnetencephalographyNetwork analysisTime-delayed phase synchronization

Identifiers

PMID21629586
PMCPMC2866368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.