ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2011
P5 medicine: a plus for a personalized approach to oncology.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying the 5P framework to improve cancer prevention in European health systems.Journal of public health policy · 2026Article
- Review
- Patients' and clinicians' knowledge in cancer-related cognitive impairment and its implications: current perspective.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework.JMIR AI · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Sleep Health: The Emergence and Impact of Personalized Sleep Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Onco-Breastomics: An Eco-Evo-Devo Holistic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.Neural plasticity · 2024Article
- Hopamine as Personalized Medicine for Persons with Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Ethical issues in oncology practice: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences and expectations.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Article
- From P4 medicine to P5 medicine: transitional times for a more human-centric approach to AI-based tools for hospitals of tomorrow.Open research Europe · 2022Article
- Personalized, Predictive, Participatory, Precision, and Preventive (P5) Medicine in Rotator Cuff Tears.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of Web-Based and Remotely Administered Surveys for Patient Preference Studies in a Vulnerable Population.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatments: A Study Protocol for a Preference Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment and Swing Weighting.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Hereditary Gastric and Breast Cancer Syndromes Related to CDH1 Germline Mutation: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Review.Cancers · 2020Review
- The clinical-care focused psychological interview (CLiC): a structured tool for the assessment of cancer patients' needs.Ecancermedicalscience · 2020Article
- Image-Guided Thermal Ablation as an Alternative to Surgery for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Preliminary Results of an Italian Experience.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
- A P5 Approach to m-Health: Design Suggestions for Advanced Mobile Health Technology.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Memories of paternal relations are associated with coping and defense mechanisms in breast cancer patients: an observational study.BMC psychology · 2017Observational
- How Do Patients Experience Individualized Medicine? A Qualitative Interview-based Study of Gene Expression Analyses in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21629214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.