Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21628683›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2011

Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Sonia K Makhija, Valeria V Gordan, Gregg H Gilbert, Mark S Litaker, D Brad Rindal, Daniel J Pihlstrom, Vibeke Qvist, Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia K MakhijaDepartment of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave. South, SDB 111, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA. smakhija@uab.edu
Valeria V Gordan
Gregg H Gilbert
Mark S Litaker
D Brad Rindal
Daniel J Pihlstrom
Vibeke Qvist
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe authors conducted a study to identify factors associated with the materials that dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) use when placing the first restoration on permanent posterior tooth surfaces.

methodsA total of 182 DPBRN practitioner-investigators provided data regarding 5,599 posterior teeth with caries. Practitioner-investigators completed an enrollment questionnaire that included the dentist's age, sex, practice workload, practice type and number of years since graduation. When patients who had provided informed consent to participate in the investigation sought treatment for a previously unrestored carious surface, the practitioner-investigator recorded patient and tooth characteristics.

resultsPractitioner-investigators used amalgam more often than they used direct resin-based composite (RBC) for posterior carious lesions. Practitioner and practice characteristics (years since graduation and type of practice); patient characteristics (sex, race, age and dental insurance status); and lesion characteristics (tooth location and surface, preoperative and postoperative lesion depth) were associated with the type of restorative material used.

conclusionsSeveral practitioner and practice, patient and lesion characteristics were associated significantly with use of amalgam and RBC: geographical region, years since dentist's graduation, patient's dental insurance status, tooth location and surface, and preoperative and postoperative lesion depth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Despite advances in esthetic dentistry, U.S. dentists still are placing amalgam on posterior teeth with carious lesions. Amalgam was used more often than RBC in older patients, who may have had deeper carious lesions.

Indexed as

Dental MaterialsAdultAge FactorsBicuspidBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchComposite ResinsCross-Sectional StudiesDental AmalgamDental CariesDental EnamelDental Restoration, PermanentDentinFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansComposite ResinsDental AmalgamDental Materials

Identifiers

PMID21628683
PMCPMC3107519
OpenAlexW12202611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.