Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21628351›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2011

Balancing punishment and compassion for seriously ill prisoners.

Brie A Williams, Rebecca L Sudore, Robert Greifinger, R Sean Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Older and incarcerated: policy implications of aging prison populations.International journal of prisoner health · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Will I stay or can I go? Assisted suicide in prison.Journal of public health policy · 2015
    Article
  9. Who Wants to Die in Here? Perspectives of Prisoners with Chronic Conditions.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brie A WilliamsUniversity of California, San Francisco, Division of Geriatrics, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121, USA. brie.williams@ucsf.edu
Rebecca L Sudore
Robert Greifinger
R Sean Morrison

Funding

Residing in the Community with Dementia at the End of Life: Understanding Hospice Use and Residential SettingP30AG028741 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ORNA INTRATOR · 2010 to 2026
$21.9M
Patient Oriented Research in Palliative Care and AgingK24AG022345 · NIA · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI MORRISON, R. SEAN · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
Health, function, and health outcomes of geriatric prisonersK23AG033102 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WILLIAMS, BRIE A · 2009 to 2013
$743k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG033102NIA NIH HHS K23AG033102NIA NIH HHS K24 AG022345NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compassionate release is a program that allows some eligible, seriously ill prisoners to die outside of prison before sentence completion. It became a matter of federal statute in 1984 and has been adopted by most U.S. prison jurisdictions. Incarceration is justified on 4 principles: retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation. Compassionate release derives from the theory that changes in health status may affect these principles and thus alter justification for incarceration and sentence completion. The medical profession is intricately involved in this process because eligibility for consideration for compassionate release is generally based on medical evidence. Many policy experts are calling for broader use of compassionate release because of many factors, such as an aging prison population, overcrowding, the increasing deaths in custody, and the soaring medical costs of the criminal justice system. Even so, the medical eligibility criteria of many compassionate-release guidelines--which often assume a definitive prognosis--are clinically flawed, and procedural barriers may further limit their rational application. We propose changes to address these flaws.

Indexed as

EmpathyGuidelines as TopicHealth Care CostsHumansPalliative CarePrisonersPrisonsPrognosisPunishmentTerminally IllUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21628351
PMCPMC3163454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.