Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21627919›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2011

Blood transfusion practice: a nationwide survey in Italy.

Franco Verlicchi, Giuseppina Facco, Michela Macrì, Stefano Antoncecchi, Pietro Bonomo

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Franco VerlicchiTransfusion Service of Ravenna, Italy. f.verlicchi@ausl.ra.it
Giuseppina Facco
Michela Macrì
Stefano Antoncecchi
Pietro Bonomo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood transfusion is a complex activity. Some of the components of this activity are implementation of standard procedures, evaluation of appropriateness of the blood use, methods for bedside identification of patients and the release of blood in emergencies, during out-of-routine hours and from hospitals lacking a Blood Centre. An overview about how these issues are managed in Italy could be of interest. MATERIALS AND

methodsA survey dealing with some issues regarding blood release was performed, using a questionnaire sent to 278 Italian Blood Centres.

resultsOut of the 278 Centres, 179 (64%) returned the questionnaire. The geographic distribution of the Centres that responded (80 in the north, 46 in the centre and 53 in the south of Italy) offers a good picture of the Italian reality. Globally there seems to be a relatively uniform application of procedures and guidelines, of methods to identify patients, and of evaluating transfusion appropriateness. The systems used to deal with emergency blood release and blood release in non-routine conditions are more variable. The use of technological resources seems to be disappointingly low. DISCUSSION: Although many aspects of the blood transfusion process should be improved, the picture that emerged from the survey seems to show, on the whole, a fair quality of blood transfusion practice in Italian Blood Centres.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionHumansItalyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21627919
PMCPMC3200414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.