Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21627842›Full record

ArticleJournal of negative results in biomedicine2011

Histopathological grading of pediatric ependymoma: reproducibility and clinical relevance in European trial cohorts.

David W Ellison, Mehmet Kocak, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Giangaspero Felice, Godfraind Catherine, Torsten Pietsch, Didier Frappaz, Maura Massimino, Jacques Grill, James M Boyett and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of negative results in biomedicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Visual outcomes after treatment of craniopharyngioma in children: A systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical, surgical, and molecular features of pediatric supratentorial ependymomas: a single-institution experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

David W EllisonDept, of Pathology, St, Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, USA. David.Ellison@stjude.org
Mehmet Kocak
Dominique Figarella-Branger
Giangaspero Felice
Godfraind Catherine
Torsten Pietsch
Didier Frappaz
Maura Massimino
Jacques Grill
James M Boyett
Richard G Grundy
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INCentre Léon Bérard · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistopathological grading of ependymoma has been controversial with respect to its reproducibility and clinical significance. In a 3-phase study, we reviewed the pathology of 229 intracranial ependymomas from European trial cohorts of infants (2 trials - SFOP/CNS9204) and older children (2 trials - AIEOP/CNS9904) to assess both diagnostic concordance among five neuropathologists and the prognostic utility of histopathological variables, particularly tumor grading.

resultsIn phase 1, using WHO criteria and without first discussing any issue related to grading ependymomas, pathologists assessed and independently graded ependymomas from 3 of 4 trial cohorts. Diagnosis of grade II ependymoma was less frequent than grade III, a difference that increased when one cohort (CNS9204) was reassessed in phase 2, during which the pathologists discussed ependymoma grading, jointly reviewed all CNS9204 tumors, and defined a novel grading system based on the WHO classification. In phase 3, repeat independent review of two cohorts (SFOP/CNS9904) using the novel system was associated with a substantial increase in concordance on grading. Extent of tumor resection was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in SFOP and AIEOP, but not in CNS9204 and CNS9904. Strength of consensus on grade was significantly associated with PFS in only one trial cohort (AIEOP). Consensus on the scoring of individual histopathological features (necrosis, angiogenesis, cell density, and mitotic activity) correlated with PFS in AIEOP, but in no other trial.

conclusionsWe conclude that concordance on grading ependymomas can be improved by using a more prescribed scheme based on the WHO classification. Unfortunately, this appears to have utility in limited clinical settings.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChildClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalEpendymomaHumansInfantBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID21627842
PMCPMC3117833
OpenAlexW1964339879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.