Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21627822›Full record

ArticleBMC biophysics2011

An upper limit for macromolecular crowding effects.

Andrew C Miklos, Conggang Li, Courtney D Sorrell, L Andrew Lyon, Gary J Pielak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biophysics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association BetweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Association BetweenInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of the size dependence of macromolecular crowding shows that smaller is better.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew C MiklosDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. gary_pielak@unc.edu.
Conggang Li
Courtney D Sorrell
L Andrew Lyon
Gary J Pielak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolutions containing high macromolecule concentrations are predicted to affect a number of protein properties compared to those properties in dilute solution. In cells, these macromolecular crowders have a large range of sizes and can occupy 30% or more of the available volume. We chose to study the stability and ps-ns internal dynamics of a globular protein whose radius is ~2 nm when crowded by a synthetic microgel composed of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) with particle radii of ~300 nm.

resultsOur studies revealed no change in protein rotational or ps-ns backbone dynamics and only mild (~0.5 kcal/mol at 37°C, pH 5.4) stabilization at a volume occupancy of 70%, which approaches the occupancy of closely packing spheres. The lack of change in rotational dynamics indicates the absence of strong crowder-protein interactions.

conclusionsOur observations are explained by the large size discrepancy between the protein and crowders and by the internal structure of the microgels, which provide interstitial spaces and internal pores where the protein can exist in a dilute solution-like environment. In summary, microgels that interact weakly with proteins do not strongly influence protein dynamics or stability because these large microgels constitute an upper size limit on crowding effects.

Identifiers

PMID21627822
PMCPMC3120801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.