Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21627805›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2011

Song exposure regulates known and novel microRNAs in the zebra finch auditory forebrain.

Preethi H Gunaratne, Ya-Chi Lin, Ashley L Benham, Jenny Drnevich, Cristian Coarfa, Jayantha B Tennakoon, Chad J Creighton, Jong H Kim, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Michael Watson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human Genomics and the Biocultural Origin of Music.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of the genome in experience-dependent plasticity: Extending the analogy of the genomic action potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ten unanswered questions in multimodal communication.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Preethi H GunaratneDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA.
Ya-Chi Lin
Ashley L Benham
Jenny Drnevich
Cristian Coarfa
Jayantha B Tennakoon
Chad J Creighton
Jong H Kim
Aleksandar Milosavljevic
Michael Watson
Sam Griffiths-Jones
David F Clayton
University of Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Songbird Neurogenomics InitiativeR01NS045264 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CLAYTON, DAVID F · 2003 to 2010
$2.6M
Experience Dependent Changes in the BrainR01NS051820 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CLAYTON, DAVID F · 2005 to 2008
$1.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05191130NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045264NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an important model for neuroscience, songbirds learn to discriminate songs they hear during tape-recorded playbacks, as demonstrated by song-specific habituation of both behavioral and neurogenomic responses in the auditory forebrain. We hypothesized that microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) may participate in the changing pattern of gene expression induced by song exposure. To test this, we used massively parallel Illumina sequencing to analyse small RNAs from auditory forebrain of adult zebra finches exposed to tape-recorded birdsong or silence.

resultsIn the auditory forebrain, we identified 121 known miRNAs conserved in other vertebrates. We also identified 34 novel miRNAs that do not align to human or chicken genomes. Five conserved miRNAs showed significant and consistent changes in copy number after song exposure across three biological replications of the song-silence comparison, with two increasing (tgu-miR-25, tgu-miR-192) and three decreasing (tgu-miR-92, tgu-miR-124, tgu-miR-129-5p). We also detected a locus on the Z sex chromosome that produces three different novel miRNAs, with supporting evidence from Northern blot and TaqMan qPCR assays for differential expression in males and females and in response to song playbacks. One of these, tgu-miR-2954-3p, is predicted (by TargetScan) to regulate eight song-responsive mRNAs that all have functions in cellular proliferation and neuronal differentiation.

conclusionsThe experience of hearing another bird singing alters the profile of miRNAs in the auditory forebrain of zebra finches. The response involves both known conserved miRNAs and novel miRNAs described so far only in the zebra finch, including a novel sex-linked, song-responsive miRNA. These results indicate that miRNAs are likely to contribute to the unique behavioural biology of learned song communication in songbirds.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexFemaleFinchesGenetic LociMaleMicroRNAsProsencephalonSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNASex FactorsMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID21627805
PMCPMC3118218
OpenAlexW2052479846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.