Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21627338›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2011

Iron-chelating therapies in a transfusion-dependent thalassaemia population in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness study.

Nantasit Luangasanatip, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Nilawan Upakdee, Peerapon Wong

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cost-Utility Analysis of four Chelation Regimens for β-thalassemia Major: a Chinese Perspective.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Economic Evaluation of Chelation Regimens for β-Thalassemia Major: a Systematic Review.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nantasit LuangasanatipCenter of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Nilawan Upakdee
Peerapon Wong
Naresuan University Hospital · THUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveβ-Thalassaemia is a major public health problem in Thailand. Use of appropriate iron-chelating agents could prevent thalassaemia-related complications, which are costly to the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) in Thai transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia patients from the societal perspective.

methodsA Markov model was used to project the life-time costs and outcomes represented as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Data on the clinical efficacy and safety of all therapeutic options were obtained from a systematic review and clinical trials. Transition probabilities were derived from published studies. Costs were obtained from the Thai Drug and Medical Supply Information Center, Thai national reimbursement rate information and other Thai literature sources. A discount rate of 3% was used. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were presented as year 2009 values. A base-case analysis was performed for thalassaemia patients requiring regular blood transfusion therapy, while a separate analysis was performed for patients requiring low (i.e. symptom-dependent, less frequent) blood transfusion therapy. A series of sensitivity analysis and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed.

resultsCompared with DFO, using DFP was dominant with lifetime cost savings of $US91 117. Comparing DFX with DFO, the incremental cost was $US522 863 and incremental QALY was 5.77 with an ICER of $US90 648 per QALY. When compared with DFP, the ICER of DFX was $US106 445 per QALY. A cost-effectiveness analysis curve showed the probability of DFX being cost effective was 0% when compared with either DFO or DFP, based on the cost-effectiveness cut-off value of $US2902 per QALY. When compared with DFP, DFX was cost effective only if the DFX cost was as low as $US1.68 per 250 mg tablet. The results of the analysis in patients requiring low blood transfusion therapy were not different from those of the base-case analysis.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that using DFP is cost saving when compared with conventional therapy, while using DFX is not cost effective compared with either DFO or DFP in Thai patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia. Policy-makers and clinicians may consider using such information in their decision-making process in Thailand.

Indexed as

Benzoatesbeta-ThalassemiaBlood TransfusionCost-Benefit AnalysisDeferasiroxDeferiproneDeferoxamineHealth Care CostsHumansIron Chelating AgentsMarkov ChainsModels, EconomicPyridonesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsThailandTriazolesBenzoatesDeferasiroxDeferiproneDeferoxamineIron Chelating AgentsPyridonesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID21627338
OpenAlexW156806157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.