SynthesisSurgery today2011
Direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized fiber for abdominal sepsis in Europe.
Synthesis in Surgery today, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion mainly helps to constrict peripheral blood vessels in treatment for septic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2015Article
- Analysis of the efficacy of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber (PMX-DHP) according to the prognostic factors in patients with colorectal perforation.Surgery today · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized fiber (PMX-DHP) received its product certification for use in Europe in 1998, several prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in European countries. The first RCT, performed in six European academic medical centers in 2005, concluded that PMX-DHP is associated with improved hemodynamic status and cardiac function. Subsequently, a meta-analysis of PMX-DHP was presented in Italy in 2007. This systematic review found positive effects of PMX-DHP on mean arterial pressure and dopamine/ dobutamine use, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, endotoxin removal, and mortality. However, like most trials on extracorporeal therapies, none of the studies was double-blinded. The EUPHAS study, a multicenter RCT performed in ten Italian intensive care units in 2009, found that PMX-DHP improved 28-day survival, blood pressure, vasopressor requirement, and degree of organ failure. However, investigators in Belgium and Canada pointed out that there was no statistical difference in 28-day survival. Two more RCTs, the ABDO-MIX and EUPHRATES studies, the primary end points of which are 28-day mortality, were started in Europe and the United States at the end of 2010. We are hoping that these RCTs will resolve this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.