Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21625984›Full record

ArticleOecologia2011

An ecological genomic approach challenging the paradigm of differential plant responses to specialist versus generalist insect herbivores.

M Gabriela Bidart-Bouzat, Daniel Kliebenstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Same Difference? Low and High GlucosinolateFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Gabriela Bidart-BouzatDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43402, USA. gbidart@bgsu.edu
Daniel Kliebenstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A general prediction of the specialist/generalist paradigm indicates that plant responses to insect herbivores may depend on the degree of ecological specialization of the insect attacker. However, results from a single greenhouse experiment evaluating the responses of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana to three specialist (Plutella xylostella, Pieris rapae, and Brevicoryne brassicae) and three generalist (Trichoplusia ni, Spodoptera exigua, and Myzus persicae) insect species did not support the previous prediction. Using an ecological genomic approach, we assessed plant responses in terms of herbivore-induced changes in genome-wide gene expression, defense-related pathways, and concentrations of glucosinolates (i.e., secondary metabolites that are ubiquitously present in cruciferous plants). Our results showed that plant responses were not influenced by the degree of specialization of insect herbivores. In contrast, responses were more strongly shaped by insect taxa (i.e., aphid vs. lepidopteran species), likely due to their different feeding modes. Interestingly, similar patterns of plant responses were induced by the same insect herbivore species in terms of defense signaling (jasmonic acid pathway), aliphatic glucosinolate metabolism (at both the gene expression and phenotypic levels) and genome-wide responses. Furthermore, plant responses to insect herbivores belonging to the same taxon (i.e., four lepidopteran species) were not explained by herbivore specialization or phylogenetic history. Overall, this study suggests that different feeding modes of insect taxa as well as herbivore-specific plant responses, which may result from distinct ecological/evolutionary interactions between A. thaliana (or a close relative) and each of the lepidopteran species, may explain why observed responses deviate from those predicted by the specialist/generalist paradigm.

Indexed as

AnimalsEcologyFeeding BehaviorGenomicsGlucosinolatesInsectaPhylogenyPlantsSpecies SpecificityGlucosinolates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.