Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21625565›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

deFuse: an algorithm for gene fusion discovery in tumor RNA-Seq data.

Andrew McPherson, Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Abdalnasser Zayed, Ryan Giuliany, Gavin Ha, Mark G F Sun, Malachi Griffith, Alireza Heravi Moussavi, Janine Senz, Nataliya Melnyk and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 321 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
321citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

321 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. An epithelioid hemangioendothelioma with a novel RREB1::TFE3 gene fusion.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole transcriptome analysis identifiesCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of theFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

261 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Andrew McPhersonCentre for Translational and Applied Genomics, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Fereydoun Hormozdiari
Abdalnasser Zayed
Ryan Giuliany
Gavin Ha
Mark G F Sun
Malachi Griffith
Alireza Heravi Moussavi
Janine Senz
Nataliya Melnyk
Marina Pacheco
Marco A Marra
Martin Hirst
Torsten O Nielsen
S Cenk Sahinalp
David Huntsman
Sohrab P Shah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene fusions created by somatic genomic rearrangements are known to play an important role in the onset and development of some cancers, such as lymphomas and sarcomas. RNA-Seq (whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing) is proving to be a useful tool for the discovery of novel gene fusions in cancer transcriptomes. However, algorithmic methods for the discovery of gene fusions using RNA-Seq data remain underdeveloped. We have developed deFuse, a novel computational method for fusion discovery in tumor RNA-Seq data. Unlike existing methods that use only unique best-hit alignments and consider only fusion boundaries at the ends of known exons, deFuse considers all alignments and all possible locations for fusion boundaries. As a result, deFuse is able to identify fusion sequences with demonstrably better sensitivity than previous approaches. To increase the specificity of our approach, we curated a list of 60 true positive and 61 true negative fusion sequences (as confirmed by RT-PCR), and have trained an adaboost classifier on 11 novel features of the sequence data. The resulting classifier has an estimated value of 0.91 for the area under the ROC curve. We have used deFuse to discover gene fusions in 40 ovarian tumor samples, one ovarian cancer cell line, and three sarcoma samples. We report herein the first gene fusions discovered in ovarian cancer. We conclude that gene fusions are not infrequent events in ovarian cancer and that these events have the potential to substantially alter the expression patterns of the genes involved; gene fusions should therefore be considered in efforts to comprehensively characterize the mutational profiles of ovarian cancer transcriptomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsOncogene FusionBase SequenceCarcinomaCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMelanomaMolecular Sequence DataMutationOvarian NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsSarcomaSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID21625565
PMCPMC3098195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.