Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21625501›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Major-effect alleles at relatively few loci underlie distinct vernalization and flowering variation in Arabidopsis accessions.

Amy Strange, Peijin Li, Clare Lister, Jillian Anderson, Norman Warthmann, Chikako Shindo, Judith Irwin, Magnus Nordborg, Caroline Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Thermo-Sensitive Alternative Splicing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy StrangeDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, England, United Kingdom.
Peijin Li
Clare Lister
Jillian Anderson
Norman Warthmann
Chikako Shindo
Judith Irwin
Magnus Nordborg
Caroline Dean

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E009662/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have explored the genetic basis of variation in vernalization requirement and response in Arabidopsis accessions, selected on the basis of their phenotypic distinctiveness. Phenotyping of F2 populations in different environments, plus fine mapping, indicated possible causative genes. Our data support the identification of FRI and FLC as candidates for the major-effect QTL underlying variation in vernalization response, and identify a weak FLC allele, caused by a Mutator-like transposon, contributing to flowering time variation in two N. American accessions. They also reveal a number of additional QTL that contribute to flowering time variation after saturating vernalization. One of these was the result of expression variation at the FT locus. Overall, our data suggest that distinct phenotypic variation in the vernalization and flowering response of Arabidopsis accessions is accounted for by variation that has arisen independently at relatively few major-effect loci.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureGenetic VariationQuantitative Trait LociAllelesArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantMADS Domain ProteinsPhenotypeReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerArabidopsis ProteinsAt5g10140 protein, ArabidopsisFRI protein, ArabidopsisMADS Domain ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21625501
PMCPMC3098857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.