ArticleNursing economic$
Complex home care: Part I--Utilization and costs to families for health care services each year.
Article in Nursing economic$. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact on caregivers of adult patients receiving parenteral support for short-bowel syndrome with intestinal failure: A multinational, cross-sectional survey.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2022Article
- Article
- A Clinical Trial of Translation of Evidence Based Interventions to Mobile Tablets and Illness Specific Internet Sites.International journal of sensor networks and data communications · 2016Article
- Costs of multidisciplinary parenteral nutrition care provided at a distance via mobile tablets.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2014Article
- Management of intestinal failure in inflammatory bowel disease: small intestinal transplantation or home parenteral nutrition?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment: Insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers.American journal of otolaryngologyArticle
- Complex home care: part III--economic impact on family caregiver quality of life and patients' clinical outcomes.Nursing economic$Article
- The feasibility of a telephone coaching program on heart failure home management for family caregivers.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careArticle
- mHealth Clinic Appointment PC Tablet: Implementation, Challenges and Solutions.Journal of mobile technology in medicineArticle
- Complex home care: Part 2- family annual income, insurance premium, and out-of-pocket expenses.Nursing economic$Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As many as 120 persons per million people in the United States are dependent on the lifelong, complex, technology-based care of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) infusions. However, data for costs paid by families for HPN-related health care services and for non-reimbursed expenditures are rarely tabulated and most often underestimated. The goals of this study were to describe health care services used by families to manage HPN, report the frequency of each service used annually, and estimate the average annual non-reimbursed costs to families for these health services. The numerous and varied types of services reported and the time required to coordinate and access HPN services illustrates the challenges faced by patients and their family caregivers. The lack of a coordinated and efficient system for delivering complex chronic care results in poorer outcomes for HPN patients and their families on-reimbursed costs and the extensive amount of time required to coordinate multi-professional services negatively impacts the clinical outcomes and quality of life of complex chronic home care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21625407PMC3101506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.