ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2011
On the Binding Strength Sequence for Nucleic Acid Bases and C(60) with Density Functional and Dispersion-corrected Density Functional Theories: Whether C(60) could protect nucleic acid bases from radiation-induced damage?
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating activity-stability trade-offs in nano-fingerprint carbon anchoring single atoms and clusters in oxygen reduction reaction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Substituent Effects in π-Stacking of Histidine on Functionalized-SWNT and Graphene.Computational & theoretical chemistry · 2015Article
- Insight into the interaction between DNA bases and defective graphenes: covalent or non-covalent.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling · 2014Article
- Interaction and protection mechanism between Li@C(60) and nucleic acid bases (NABs): performance of PM6-DH2 on noncovalent interaction of NABs-Li@C60.Journal of computational chemistry · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The major objective of this paper is to address a controversial binding sequence between nucleic acid bases (NABs) and C(60) by investigating adsorptions of NABs and their cations on C(60) fullerene with a variety of density functional theories including two novel hybrid meta-GGA functionals, M05-2x and M06-2x, as well as a dispersion-corrected density functional, PBE-D. The M05-2x/6-311++G** provides the same binding sequence as previously reported, guanine(G) > cytosine(C) > adenine (A) > thymine (T); however, M06-2x switches the binding strengths of A and C, and PBE-D eventually results in the following sequence, G>A>T>C, which is the same as the widely accepted hierarchy for the stacking of NABs on other carbon nanomaterials such as single-walled carbon nanotube and graphite. The results indicate that the questionable relative binding strength is due to insufficient electron correlation treatment with the M05-2x or even the M06-2x method. The binding energy of G@C(60) obtained with the M06-2x/6-311++G(d,p) and the PBE-D/cc-pVDZ is -7.10 and -8.07 kcal/mol, respectively, and the latter is only slightly weaker than that predicted by the MP2/6-31G(d,p) (-8.10kca/mol). Thus, the PDE-D performs better than the M06-2x for the observed NAB@C(60) π-stacked complexes. To discuss whether C(60) could prevent NABs from radiation-induced damage, ionization potentials of NABs and C(60), and frontier molecular orbitals of the complexes NABs@C(60) and (NABs@C(60))(+) are also extensively investigated. These results revealed that when an electron escapes from the complexes, a hole was preferentially created in C(60) for T and C complexes, while for G and A the hole delocalizes over the entire complex, rather than a localization on the C(60) moiety. The interesting finding might open a new strategy for protecting DNA from radiation-induced damage and offer a new idea for designing C(60)-based antiradiation drugs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.