Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21625053›Full record

ReviewJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2011

Tendon tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and translation to the clinic.

J T Shearn, K R Kinneberg, N A Dyment, M T Galloway, K Kenter, C Wylie, D L Butler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Focal adhesion kinase regulates tendon cell mechanoresponse and physiological tendon development.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A brief history of tendon and ligament bioreactors: Impact and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  8. In Vitro Innovation of Tendon Tissue Engineering Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Spectrum of Tendon Pathologies: Triggers, Trails and End-State.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J T ShearnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, 852 Engineering Research Center, University of Cincinnati, 2901 Woodside Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0048, USA. jason.shearn@uc.edu
K R Kinneberg
N A Dyment
M T Galloway
K Kenter
C Wylie
D L Butler

Funding

In Vitro Mechanical Stimulation to Enhance Tendon RepairR01AR046574 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI BUTLER, DAVID L · 2000 to 2009
$3.5M
A Developmentally-Based Tissue Engineering Approach to Improve Tendon RepairR01AR056943 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SHEARN, JASON T · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
Establishing Design Criteria and Large Animal Model for Evaluation of ACL RepairR01AR056660 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SHEARN, JASON T · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR46574NIAMS NIH HHS AR56943NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR046574NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056660NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tissue engineering field has made great strides in understanding how different aspects of tissue engineered constructs (TECs) and the culture process affect final tendon repair. However, there remain significant challenges in developing strategies that will lead to a clinically effective and commercially successful product. In an effort to increase repair quality, a better understanding of normal development, and how it differs from adult tendon healing, may provide strategies to improve tissue engineering. As tendon tissue engineering continues to improve, the field needs to employ more clinically relevant models of tendon injury such as degenerative tendons. We need to translate successes to larger animal models to begin exploring the clinical implications of our treatments. By advancing the models used to validate our TECs, we can help convince our toughest customer, the surgeon, that our products will be clinically efficacious. As we address these challenges in musculoskeletal tissue engineering, the field still needs to address the commercialization of products developed in the laboratory. TEC commercialization faces numerous challenges because each injury and patient is unique. This review aims to provide tissue engineers with a summary of important issues related to engineering tendon repairs and potential strategies for producing clinically successful products.

Indexed as

AnimalsCommerceDisease Models, AnimalHumansStress, MechanicalTendinopathyTendonsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID21625053
PMCPMC3689273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.