Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21624552›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2011

Coronary artery distensibility assessed by 3.0 Tesla coronary magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with and without coronary artery disease.

Sebastian Kelle, Allison G Hays, Glenn A Hirsch, Gary Gerstenblith, Julie M Miller, Angela M Steinberg, Michael Schär, John H Texter, Ernst Wellnhofer, Robert G Weiss and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. In vitro optimization and comparison of CT angiography versus radial cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the quantification of cross-sectional areas and coronary endothelial function.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Automatic evaluation of vessel diameter variation from 2D X-ray angiography.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian KelleDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, German Heart Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Allison G Hays
Glenn A Hirsch
Gary Gerstenblith
Julie M Miller
Angela M Steinberg
Michael Schär
John H Texter
Ernst Wellnhofer
Robert G Weiss
Matthias Stuber
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEJohns Hopkins University · USPhilips (United States) · US

Funding

CONTRIBUTION OF ENERGY DEPLETION TO HUMAN HEART FAILURER01HL061912 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WEISS, ROBERT G · 1999 to 2020
$8.0M
Non-Invasive Measures of Regional Coronary Endothelial Function by 3T MRIR01HL084186 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STUBER, MATTHIAS · 2006 to 2010
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL61912NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061912NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084186NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL084186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary vessel distensibility is reduced with atherosclerosis and normal aging, but direct measurements have historically required invasive measurements at cardiac catheterization. Therefore, we sought to assess coronary artery distensibility noninvasively using 3.0 Telsa coronary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to test the hypothesis that this noninvasive technique can detect differences in coronary distensibility between healthy subjects and those with coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 38 healthy, adult subjects (23 men, mean age 31 ± 10 years) and 21 patients with CAD, diagnosed using x-ray angiography (11 men, mean age 57 ± 6 years) were studied using a commercial whole-body MRI system. In each subject, the proximal segment of a coronary artery was imaged for the cross-sectional area measurements using cine spiral MRI. The distensibility (mm Hg(-1) × 10(3)) was determined as (end-systolic lumen area - end-diastolic lumen area)/(pulse pressure × end-diastolic lumen area). The pulse pressure was calculated as the difference between the systolic and diastolic brachial blood pressure. A total of 34 healthy subjects and 19 patients had adequate image quality for coronary area measurements. Coronary artery distensibility was significantly greater in the healthy subjects than in those with CAD (mean ± SD 2.4 ± 1.7 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3) vs 1.1 ± 1.1 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3), respectively, p = 0.007; median 2.2 vs 0.9 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3)). In a subgroup of 10 patients with CAD, we found a significant correlation between the coronary artery distensibility measurements assessed using MRI and x-ray coronary angiography (R = 0.65, p = 0.003). In a group of 10 healthy subjects, the repeated distensibility measurements demonstrated a significant correlation (R = 0.80, p = 0.006). In conclusion, 3.0-Tesla MRI, a reproducible noninvasive method to assess human coronary artery vessel wall distensibility, is able to detect significant differences in distensibility between healthy subjects and those with CAD.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance AngiographyAdultCase-Control StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID21624552
PMCPMC3159191
OpenAlexW2168539277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.