ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2011
Coronary artery distensibility assessed by 3.0 Tesla coronary magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with and without coronary artery disease.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-shot gradient-echo planar imaging sequence in non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Simultaneous assessment of vascular distensibility and vessel wall area at coronary, carotid, and aortic level in diabetic patients using CMR: detection of vascular remodeling.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2023Article
- Noninvasive detection of impaired pulmonary artery endothelial function in people living with HIV.AIDS (London, England) · 2020Article
- Non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography: current frontiers and future horizons.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Article
- In vitro optimization and comparison of CT angiography versus radial cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the quantification of cross-sectional areas and coronary endothelial function.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019Article
- Effect of stenosis eccentricity on the functionality of coronary bifurcation lesions-a numerical study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2017Article
- Automatic evaluation of vessel diameter variation from 2D X-ray angiography.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017Article
- Article
- High efficiency coronary MR angiography with nonrigid cardiac motion correction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2016Article
- A comparison between the principal stress direction and collagen fiber orientation in coronary atherosclerotic plaque fibrous caps.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2015Article
- Article
- Regional coronary endothelial function is closely related to local early coronary atherosclerosis in patients with mild coronary artery disease: pilot study.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary vessel distensibility is reduced with atherosclerosis and normal aging, but direct measurements have historically required invasive measurements at cardiac catheterization. Therefore, we sought to assess coronary artery distensibility noninvasively using 3.0 Telsa coronary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to test the hypothesis that this noninvasive technique can detect differences in coronary distensibility between healthy subjects and those with coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 38 healthy, adult subjects (23 men, mean age 31 ± 10 years) and 21 patients with CAD, diagnosed using x-ray angiography (11 men, mean age 57 ± 6 years) were studied using a commercial whole-body MRI system. In each subject, the proximal segment of a coronary artery was imaged for the cross-sectional area measurements using cine spiral MRI. The distensibility (mm Hg(-1) × 10(3)) was determined as (end-systolic lumen area - end-diastolic lumen area)/(pulse pressure × end-diastolic lumen area). The pulse pressure was calculated as the difference between the systolic and diastolic brachial blood pressure. A total of 34 healthy subjects and 19 patients had adequate image quality for coronary area measurements. Coronary artery distensibility was significantly greater in the healthy subjects than in those with CAD (mean ± SD 2.4 ± 1.7 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3) vs 1.1 ± 1.1 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3), respectively, p = 0.007; median 2.2 vs 0.9 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3)). In a subgroup of 10 patients with CAD, we found a significant correlation between the coronary artery distensibility measurements assessed using MRI and x-ray coronary angiography (R = 0.65, p = 0.003). In a group of 10 healthy subjects, the repeated distensibility measurements demonstrated a significant correlation (R = 0.80, p = 0.006). In conclusion, 3.0-Tesla MRI, a reproducible noninvasive method to assess human coronary artery vessel wall distensibility, is able to detect significant differences in distensibility between healthy subjects and those with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.