ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2011
An open annotation ontology for science on web 3.0.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biotea-2-Bioschemas, facilitating structured markup for semantically annotated scholarly publications.Genomics & informatics · 2019Article
- Biotea: semantics for Pubmed Central.PeerJ · 2018Article
- AnnoSys-implementation of a generic annotation system for schema-based data using the example of biodiversity collection data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- A semantic-based workflow for biomedical literature annotation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- Using Nonexperts for Annotating Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Mentions in Product Labeling: A Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- The role of ontologies in biological and biomedical research: a functional perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Extending the evaluation of Genia Event task toward knowledge base construction and comparison to Gene Regulation Ontology task.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Biomedical imaging ontologies: A survey and proposal for future work.Journal of pathology informatics · 2015Article
- An intelligent content discovery technique for health portal content management.JMIR medical informatics · 2014Article
- Mining images in biomedical publications: Detection and analysis of gel diagrams.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- Benchmarking infrastructure for mutation text mining.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- SEE: structured representation of scientific evidence in the biomedical domain using Semantic Web techniques.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- Structuring research methods and data with the research object model: genomics workflows as a case study.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- PAV ontology: provenance, authoring and versioning.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2013Article
- Biotea: RDFizing PubMed Central in support for the paper as an interface to the Web of Data.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2013Article
- Semantic annotation of mutable data.PloS one · 2013Article
- BioC: a minimalist approach to interoperability for biomedical text processing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
- Representing annotation compositionality and provenance for the Semantic Web.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2013Article
- Mining the pharmacogenomics literature--a survey of the state of the art.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is currently a gap between the rich and expressive collection of published biomedical ontologies, and the natural language expression of biomedical papers consumed on a daily basis by scientific researchers. The purpose of this paper is to provide an open, shareable structure for dynamic integration of biomedical domain ontologies with the scientific document, in the form of an Annotation Ontology (AO), thus closing this gap and enabling application of formal biomedical ontologies directly to the literature as it emerges.
methodsInitial requirements for AO were elicited by analysis of integration needs between biomedical web communities, and of needs for representing and integrating results of biomedical text mining. Analysis of strengths and weaknesses of previous efforts in this area was also performed. A series of increasingly refined annotation tools were then developed along with a metadata model in OWL, and deployed for feedback and additional requirements the ontology to users at a major pharmaceutical company and a major academic center. Further requirements and critiques of the model were also elicited through discussions with many colleagues and incorporated into the work.
resultsThis paper presents Annotation Ontology (AO), an open ontology in OWL-DL for annotating scientific documents on the web. AO supports both human and algorithmic content annotation. It enables "stand-off" or independent metadata anchored to specific positions in a web document by any one of several methods. In AO, the document may be annotated but is not required to be under update control of the annotator. AO contains a provenance model to support versioning, and a set model for specifying groups and containers of annotation. AO is freely available under open source license at http://purl.org/ao/, and extensive documentation including screencasts is available on AO's Google Code page: http://code.google.com/p/annotation-ontology/ .
conclusionsThe Annotation Ontology meets critical requirements for an open, freely shareable model in OWL, of annotation metadata created against scientific documents on the Web. We believe AO can become a very useful common model for annotation metadata on Web documents, and will enable biomedical domain ontologies to be used quite widely to annotate the scientific literature. Potential collaborators and those with new relevant use cases are invited to contact the authors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.