SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2011
Most bowel cancer symptoms do not indicate colorectal cancer and polyps: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating miRNAs as liquid biopsy biomarkers for diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Red Flag Signs and Symptoms for Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with possible colorectal cancer symptoms: meta-analysis.The British journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Detection of cancers and advanced adenomas in asymptomatic participants in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- Development and external validation of a machine-learning risk model for colorectal cancer triage in Sweden's fast-track pathway.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with possible colorectal cancer symptoms: insights from the New Zealand FIT for symptomatic pilot.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Variations in the Use of Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) in Primary Care in England: A Population-Based Cohort of 531,735 FITs from 495,121 Patients Between 2019 and 2023.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- An ontology-based method for formalizing and encoding patient colonoscopy preparation using BPMN and OWL2 for automated tool development.Journal of clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Raman spectroscopy on dried blood plasma allows diagnosis and monitoring of colorectal cancer.MedComm · 2024Article
- The Value of Colonoscopy in Assessing Rectal Bleeding in Patients Referred From Outpatient Care Units in Erbil, Iraq.Cureus · 2024Article
- Identification and analysis of key genes related to efferocytosis in colorectal cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
- Trends in colorectal cancer screening compliance and incidence among 60- to 74-year-olds in China.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Advancements and Challenges in the Image-Based Diagnosis of Lung and Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cancer informatics · 2024Review
- Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Symptoms.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.Cureus · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- The association between sociodemographic factors and time to diagnosis for colorectal cancer in northern Sweden.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- The COLO-COHORT (Colorectal Cancer Cohort) study: Protocol for a multi-centre, observational research study and development of a consent-for-contact research platform.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBowel symptoms are often considered an indication to perform colonoscopy to identify or rule out colorectal cancer or precancerous polyps. Investigation of bowel symptoms for this purpose is recommended by numerous clinical guidelines. However, the evidence for this practice is unclear. The objective of this study is to systematically review the evidence about the association between bowel symptoms and colorectal cancer or polyps.
methodsWe searched the literature extensively up to December 2008, using MEDLINE and EMBASE and following references. For inclusion in the review, papers from cross sectional, case control and cohort studies had to provide a 2×2 table of symptoms by diagnosis (colorectal cancer or polyps) or sufficient data from which that table could be constructed. The search procedure, quality appraisal, and data extraction was done twice, with disagreements resolved with another reviewer. Summary ROC analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of symptoms to detect colorectal cancer and polyps.
resultsColorectal cancer was associated with rectal bleeding (AUC 0.66; LR+ 1.9; LR- 0.7) and weight loss (AUC 0.67, LR+ 2.5, LR- 0.9). Neither of these symptoms was associated with the presence of polyps. There was no significant association of colorectal cancer or polyps with change in bowel habit, constipation, diarrhoea or abdominal pain. Neither the clinical setting (primary or specialist care) nor study type was associated with accuracy.Most studies had methodological flaws. There was no consistency in the way symptoms were elicited or interpreted in the studies.
conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that the common practice of performing colonoscopies to identify cancers in people with bowel symptoms is warranted only for rectal bleeding and the general symptom of weight loss. Bodies preparing guidelines for clinicians and consumers to improve early detection of colorectal cancer need to take into account the limited value of symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.