Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21624025›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2012

Defining and measuring patient-centred care: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review of the stroke literature.

Maggie Lawrence, Sue Kinn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maggie LawrenceInstitute for Applied Health Research/School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Sue Kinn

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvolving patients in the determination of their care is increasingly important, and health-care professionals worldwide have recognized a need for clinical outcome measures and interventions that facilitate patient-centred care delivery in a range of settings.

aimA mixed-methods review was conducted, which aimed to identify stroke-specific patient-centred outcome measures and patient-centred interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases searched included MEDLINE and PsycINFO; search strings were based on MeSH terms and keywords associated with the terms 'stroke' and 'patient-centred'. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative data; thematic analysis was also performed in the included studies. MAIN

resultsThree patient-centred outcome measures (Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes, Stroke Impact Scale, Communication Outcome after Stroke scale) and four interventions were identified. Key elements of intervention design included delivery in people's own homes, involvement of families and tailoring to individual needs and priorities. Thematic analysis enabled description of three broad themes: meaningfulness and relevance, quality, and communication, which informed the development of a definition of patient-centred care specific to the specialty of stroke.

conclusionsIt is important for health-care professionals to ensure that their practice is relevant to patients and families. The review identified three stroke-specific patient-centred outcome measures, key elements of patient-centred interventions, and informed the development of a definition of patient-centred care. These review-derived outputs represent a useful starting point for health-care professionals, whatever their specialty, who are working to reconcile tensions between priorities of health-care professionals and those of patients and their families, to ensure delivery of patient-centred care.

Indexed as

CommunicationFamilyStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingCognitionHealth StatusHumansInterpersonal RelationsMental HealthPatient-Centered CareQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21624025
PMCPMC5060626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.