Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21624022›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2012

Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.

Emma F France, Louise Locock, Kate Hunt, Sue Ziebland, Kate Field, Sally Wyke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  9. Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  10. The implications of patients and carers as active agents in health care and the consequences for their own health, the health of their families and health system.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma F FranceSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Alliance for Self Care Research, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. Emma.France@stir.ac.uk
Louise Locock
Kate Hunt
Sue Ziebland
Kate Field
Sally Wyke

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP1Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of disability is considered key information to enable informed antenatal screening decisions by expectant parents. However, little is known about the role of experiential knowledge of disability in decisions to terminate or continue with a pregnancy diagnosed with a fetal abnormality.

objectiveTo explore the role that expectant parents' experiential knowledge of disabilities and conditions can play in real-life decisions to continue or end a pregnancy with a fetal abnormality.

designSecondary analysis of qualitative narrative interview data informed by contextual systems framework.

settingParticipants were recruited throughout the United Kingdom and interviewed between 2004 and 2006.

participantsTwenty-four women and four of their male partners who had direct or indirect experience of disability or illness and who had proceeded with or ended a pregnancy diagnosed with a fetal abnormality.

findingsMost respondents recounted using their experiential knowledge of disability, whether of their unborn baby's condition or of a different condition, to try to imagine the future for their unborn child, themselves and their family when making their decision. Some, who were considering continuing their pregnancy and had little or no experience of their unborn baby's specific disability, sought out others' experiences of the condition following antenatal diagnosis.The nature of a parent's experiential knowledge did not predict whether they continued with or terminated their pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Prospective parents may find it helpful to discuss their existing knowledge of their unborn baby's condition with health professionals who are aware of the influence this might have on parents' decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAbortion, InducedAdultCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21624022
PMCPMC5060609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.