ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2011
Attitudes of health care professionals toward pharmacogenetic testing.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical implications of APOE genotyping for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk estimation: a review of the literature.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- Pharmacogenomics in clinical trials: an overview.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Opportunities for personalizing colorectal cancer care: an analysis of SEER-medicare data.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Article
- Expectations and educational needs of rheumatologists, rheumatology fellows and patients in the field of precision medicine in Canada, a quantitative cross-sectional and descriptive study.BMC rheumatology · 2021Article
- Prescriber Attitudes Toward Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Family Medicine Residency Program.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2018Article
- A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.Pharmacogenomics · 2016Review
- Pharmacogenomics in children: advantages and challenges of next generation sequencing applications.International journal of pediatrics · 2013Article
- Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.Clinical genetics · 2012Article
- Pharmacogenomics in Primary Care: A Crucial Entry Point for Global Personalized Medicine?Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacogenetics has emerged as a new tool for the optimization of drug therapy. Although the pharmacogenetics concept was first recognized at least 50 years ago, clinical testing to determine pharmacogenetic traits is still relatively rare, and many hurdles are markedly slowing its development. There is a lot of literature and speculation about potential ethical challenges in genetic and pharmacogenetic testing, yet few researchers have actually examined the attitudes of health care professionals regarding the clinical application of these tests.
objectiveIn this article, we aim to review the current literature on health care professionals' perceptions of the role of pharmacogenetic data and describe the attitudes of medical students when faced with a clinical pharmacogenetic testing scenario.
methodsA group of 59 third-year medical students from the American University of Beirut Medical Center were asked to answer a questionnaire about pharmacogenetic testing after being exposed to a clinical scenario of a patient who was diagnosed with mild Alzheimer Disease (AD) and hence was a candidate for therapy with one of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors.
resultsThe students indicated that they would respect patients' confidentiality and inform them about the test results and therapeutic plan, but they would not be as open about bad prognoses. They did not agree on the therapeutic plan that would follow a pharmacogenetic test result and were uncertain about potential patient discrimination in insurability.
conclusionOur and others' findings demonstrate the existence and seriousness of several challenges pertaining to pharmacogenetic applications in the clinical setting. Further training and education are needed for health care professionals, since they are the ones who will most probably request these tests in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.