ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2011
Effect of socioeconomic status on secondary prevention of stroke.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caregiver's education level and child's dental caries in African Americans: a path analytic study.Caries research · 2015Trial
- Article
- Impact of socioeconomics and race on clinical follow-up and trial enrollment and adherence in cerebral cavernous malformation.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2023Article
- Adherence to Post-Stroke Pharmacotherapy: Scale Validation and Correlates among a Sample of Stroke Survivors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Early predictors of childhood caries among 4-year-old children: a population-based study in north-eastern France.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021Observational
- A cohort study on the relationship between education level and high-risk population of stroke.Ibrain · 2021Article
- Socioeconomic status predicts the risk of stroke death: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Preventive medicine reports · 2020Review
- Effects of socioeconomic status on risk of ischemic stroke: a case-control study in the Guangzhou population.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Hypertension unawareness among Chinese patients with first-ever stroke.BMC public health · 2016Article
- Income and education as predictors of stroke mortality after the survival of a first stroke.Stroke research and treatment · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCardiovascular risk factors increase risk for stroke recurrence. Secondary prevention of stroke may be affected not only by established risk factors, but also socioeconomic status. This study evaluates relationships between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular and behavioral factors.
designCross-section study.
settingPublic Health and Education Institute, Peking University.
participantsOutpatients (n = 2354) with a past diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack. INTERVENTION(S): The investigation consisted of a questionnaire regarding patients' socioeconomic and living status, and a clinical examination at the research center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Control rates of risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
resultsWith regard to hypertension patients, 67.0% were aware of having hypertension, 63.6% were treated and 53.9% had controlled hypertension; for patients with hypercholesterolemia, 46.7% were aware of having hypercholesterolemia, 38.6% were treated and 3.8% had controlled hypercholesterolemia; for patients with diabetes mellitus, 28.0% were aware of having diabetes mellitus, 25.7% were treated and 3.5% had controlled diabetes mellitus. After multivariate analysis, education was the strongest associated factor for controls of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. After adjustment for sex and age, strong and graduated relationships were noted between the level of education and control of risk factors, with the odds ratios increasing at every increment.
conclusionEducation exerts the most important effect on the control of established cardiovascular risk factors; Successful intervention to reduce these risk factors will have to be addressed, not just with regard to specific risk factors, but also with the societal conditions that lead to the adoption and maintenance of high-risk behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.