Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21622656›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

CoMet--a web server for comparative functional profiling of metagenomes.

Thomas Lingner, Kathrin Petra Asshauer, Fabian Schreiber, Peter Meinicke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Web Resources for Metagenomics Studies.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Metagenomic surveys of gut microbiota.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring neighborhoods in the metagenome universe.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas LingnerDepartment of Bioinformatics, Institute for Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August University Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. thomas@gobics.de
Kathrin Petra Asshauer
Fabian Schreiber
Peter Meinicke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing the functional potential of newly sequenced genomes and metagenomes has become a common task in biomedical and biological research. With the advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies comparative metagenomics opens the way to elucidate the genetically determined similarities and differences of complex microbial communities. We developed the web server 'CoMet' (http://comet.gobics.de), which provides an easy-to-use comparative metagenomics platform that is well-suitable for the analysis of large collections of metagenomic short read data. CoMet combines the ORF finding and subsequent assignment of protein sequences to Pfam domain families with a comparative statistical analysis. Besides comprehensive tabular data files, the CoMet server also provides visually interpretable output in terms of hierarchical clustering and multi-dimensional scaling plots and thus allows a quick overview of a given set of metagenomic samples.

Indexed as

SoftwareCluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalInternetMetagenomeMetagenomicsProtein Structure, TertiarySequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, Protein

Identifiers

PMID21622656
PMCPMC3125781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.