Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21619637›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2011

Transcriptome profiling of chemosensory appendages in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae reveals tissue- and sex-specific signatures of odor coding.

R Jason Pitts, David C Rinker, Patrick L Jones, Antonis Rokas, Laurence J Zwiebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The sensory biology of mosquito gustation.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex-specific transcriptome dynamics ofGenes & development · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Jason PittsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
David C Rinker
Patrick L Jones
Antonis Rokas
Laurence J Zwiebel

Funding

Examination of Odorant Receptors in Vector MosquitoesR01AI056402 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZWIEBEL, LAURENCE J · 2003 to 2013
$4.0M
Training Program on Genetic Variation and Human PhenotypesT32GM080178 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI COX, NANCY J, SAMUELS, DAVID C · 2007 to 2021
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI056402NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056402NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080178PHS HHS DEB-0844968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemosensory signal transduction guides the behavior of many insects, including Anopheles gambiae, the major vector for human malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. To better understand the molecular basis of mosquito chemosensation we have used whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to compare transcript expression profiles between the two major chemosensory tissues, the antennae and maxillary palps, of adult female and male An. gambiae.

resultsWe compared chemosensory tissue transcriptomes to whole body transcriptomes of each sex to identify chemosensory enhanced genes. In the six data sets analyzed, we detected expression of nearly all known chemosensory genes and found them to be highly enriched in both olfactory tissues of males and females. While the maxillary palps of both sexes demonstrated strict chemosensory gene expression overlap, we observed acute differences in sensory specialization between male and female antennae. The relatively high expression levels of chemosensory genes in the female antennae reveal its role as an organ predominately assigned to chemosensation. Remarkably, the expression of these genes was highly conserved in the male antennae, but at much lower relative levels. Alternatively, consistent with a role in mating, the male antennae displayed significant enhancement of genes involved in audition, while the female enhancement of these genes was observed, but to a lesser degree.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the chemoreceptive spectrum, as defined by gene expression profiles, is largely similar in female and male An. gambiae. However, assuming sensory receptor expression levels are correlated with sensitivity in each case, we posit that male and female antennae are perceptive to the same stimuli, but possess inverse receptive prioritizations and sensitivities. Here we have demonstrated the use of RNA-seq to characterize the sensory specializations of an important disease vector and grounded future studies investigating chemosensory processes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingOdorantsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsAnophelesArthropod AntennaeBehavior, AnimalChemoreceptor CellsChromosome MappingFemaleGenes, InsectInsect VectorsLife Cycle StagesMalariaMaleOrgan SpecificityRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21619637
PMCPMC3126782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.