ArticleBMC health services research2011
Patient involvement in patient safety: Protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting.
Article in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The patient reporting and action for a safe environment (PRASE) intervention: a feasibility study.BMC health services research · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Intervention to improve adverse event reporting in the emergency department: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Patient Perceptions on Safety Culture in a Hospital Setting Scale.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Patients' Perception of Safety in an Italian Hospital Using the PMOS-30 Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Assessing Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture in the Hospital Setting: Development and Initial Evaluation of the Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture Scale.Journal of patient safety · 2020Article
- Patient Characteristics That Influence the Experience of Patient Participation in Therapeutic Decision Making.Iranian journal of public health · 2019Article
- Patients' Perspectives of Engagement as a Safety Strategy.Oncology nursing forum · 2017Article
- Article
- Patient safety work in Sweden: quantitative and qualitative analysis of annual patient safety reports.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Review
- Facilitators and barriers influencing patient safety in Swedish hospitals: a qualitative study of nurses' perceptions.BMC nursing · 2014Article
- Factors influencing patient safety in Sweden: perceptions of patient safety officers in the county councils.BMC health services research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients have the potential to provide a rich source of information on both organisational aspects of safety and patient safety incidents. This project aims to develop two patient safety interventions to promote organisational learning about safety - a patient measure of organisational safety (PMOS), and a patient incident reporting tool (PIRT) - to help the NHS prevent patient safety incidents by learning more about when and why they occur.
methodsTo develop the PMOS 1) literature will be reviewed to identify similar measures and key contributory factors to error; 2) four patient focus groups will ascertain practicality and feasibility; 3) 25 patient interviews will elicit approximately 60 items across 10 domains; 4) 10 patient and clinician interviews will test acceptability and understanding. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic content analysis.To develop the PIRT 1) individual and then combined patient and clinician focus groups will provide guidance for the development of three potential reporting tools; 2) nine wards across three hospital directorates will pilot each of the tools for three months. The best performing tool will be identified from the frequency, volume and quality of reports. The validity of both measures will be tested. 300 patients will be asked to complete the PMOS and PIRT during their stay in hospital. A sub-sample (N = 50) will complete the PMOS again one week later. Health professionals in participating wards will also be asked to complete the AHRQ safety culture questionnaire. Case notes for all patients will be reviewed. The psychometric properties of the PMOS will be assessed and a final valid and reliable version developed. Concurrent validity for the PIRT will be assessed by comparing reported incidents with those identified from case note review and the existing staff reporting scheme. In a subsequent study these tools will be used to provide information to wards/units about their priorities for patient safety. A patient panel will provide steering to the research. DISCUSSION: The PMOS and PIRT aim to provide a reliable means of eliciting patient views about patient safety. Both interventions are likely to have relevance and practical utility for all NHS hospital trusts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.