Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21619024›Full record

ArticleNano letters2011

Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy.

James E Evans, Katherine L Jungjohann, Nigel D Browning, Ilke Arslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A workflow for correlativeNanoscale horizons · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imaging CuNature communications · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of complex, beam-sensitive materials by transmission electron microscopy and associated techniques.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shape-preserving amorphous-to-crystalline transformation of CaCOProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James E EvansDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States. JEEvans@UCDavis.edu
Katherine L Jungjohann
Nigel D Browning
Ilke Arslan

Funding

Real-time imaging of dynamic biological processes at nanometer spatial resolutionRC1GM091755 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI EVANS, JAMES E · 2009 to 2010
$999k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5RC1GM91755NIGMS NIH HHS RC1 GM091755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct visualization of lead sulfide nanoparticle growth is demonstrated by selectively decomposing a chemical precursor from a multicomponent solution using in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. We demonstrate reproducible control over growth mechanisms that dictate the final morphology of nanostructures while observing growth in real-time with subnanometer spatial resolution. Furthermore, while an intense electron beam can initiate nanoparticle growth, it is also shown that a laser can trigger the reaction independently of the imaging electrons.

Indexed as

LasersLeadMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanoparticlesNanotechnologyParticle SizeSolutionsSulfidesSurface PropertiesLeadlead sulfideSolutionsSulfides

Identifiers

PMID21619024
PMCPMC3162246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.