Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21618422›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2012

Superior outcome of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients with orbital and CNS myeloid sarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Donna L Johnston, Todd A Alonzo, Robert B Gerbing, Beverly J Lange, William G Woods

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bilateral Ocular Exophthalmia - A Case of Atypical Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia in a Child.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Donna L JohnstonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. djohnston@cheo.on.ca
Todd A Alonzo
Robert B Gerbing
Beverly J Lange
William G Woods
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta · USChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Oncology Group · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, JAMES R · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA98413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA98543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtramedullary leukemia (EML) is common in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and occurs as leukemia cells within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or as a solid tumor (myeloid sarcoma-MS). The effect of MS on survival is unknown.

methodsPatients on CCG protocols 2861, 2891, 2941, and 2961 being treated for AML with intensive-timing chemotherapy were classified for the presence of EML (CSF leukemia, CNS-MS, orbital-MS, or non-CNS MS). CSF leukemia was classified as CNS3 (>5 WBC in the CSF with blasts) and non-CSF leukemia as CNS1/2 (<5 WBC in the CSF with or without blasts). Characteristics and outcomes of these patients were compared.

resultsOf the 1,459 total patients, 1,206 (82%) had no EML, 154 (11%) had CSF leukemia, 19 (1%) had CNS-MS, 23 (2%) had orbital-MS, and 57 (4%) had non-CNS MS. The CR rate was significantly higher in patients with orbital-MS and CNS-MS than in those with non-MS and non-CNS MS (96% and 95% vs. 78% and 78%, P = 0.034). Patients with orbital-MS and CNS-MS had significantly higher overall survival than patients with non-CNS MS (92% and 73% vs. 38%, P < 0.001), CNS3 patients (92% and 73% vs. 51, P < 0.001), and CNS1/2 patients (92% and 73% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). Patients with orbital-MS had a significantly lower relapse rate.

conclusionPatients with MS involving orbital and CNS sites had a significantly better survival than patients with non-CNS MS, with CSF leukemia, or with no EML.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasms, Second PrimaryOrbital NeoplasmsSarcoma, MyeloidAdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID21618422
PMCPMC3165066
OpenAlexW2092029921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.