Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21618227›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2011

Inputs to the midbrain dopaminergic complex in the rat, with emphasis on extended amygdala-recipient sectors.

Daniel S Zahm, Anita Y Cheng, Tristan J Lee, Comeron W Ghobadi, Zachary M Schwartz, Stefanie Geisler, Kenneth P Parsely, Clemens Gruber, Ruediger W Veh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Glutamatergic Systems and Memory Mechanisms Underlying Opioid Addiction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Basal forebrain subcortical projections.Brain structure & function · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Beyond the Classic VTA: Extended Amygdala Projections to DA-Striatal Paths in the Primate.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel S ZahmDepartment of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA. zahmds@slu.edu
Anita Y Cheng
Tristan J Lee
Comeron W Ghobadi
Zachary M Schwartz
Stefanie Geisler
Kenneth P Parsely
Clemens Gruber
Ruediger W Veh
Saint Louis University · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

CONVERGENT VS.PARALLEL STRIATAL DOPAMINERGIC AFFERENTSR01NS023805 · NINDS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI ZAHM, DANIEL S · 1986 to 2017
$4.3M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-23805NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The midbrain dopaminergic neuronal groups A8, A9, A10, and A10dc occupy, respectively, the retrorubral field (RRF), substantia nigra compacta (SNc), ventral tegmental area (VTA), and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (PAGvl). Collectively, these structures give rise to a mixed dopaminergic and nondopaminergic projection system that essentially permits adaptive behavior. However, knowledge is incomplete regarding how the afferents of these structures are organized. Although the VTA is known to receive numerous afferents from cortex, basal forebrain, and brainstem and the SNc is widely perceived as receiving inputs mainly from the striatum, the afferents of the RRF and PAGvl have yet to be assessed comprehensively. This study was performed to provide an account of those connections and to seek a better understanding of how afferents might contribute to the functional interrelatedness of the VTA, SNc, RRF, and PAGvl. Ventral midbrain structures received injections of retrograde tracer, and the resulting retrogradely labeled structures were targeted with injections of anterogradely transported Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Whereas all injections of retrograde tracer into the VTA, SNc, RRF, or PAGvl produced labeling in many structures extending from the cortex to caudal brainstem, pronounced labeling of structures making up the central division of the extended amygdala occurred following injections that involved the RRF and PAGvl. The anterograde tracing supported this finding, and the combination of retrograde and anterograde labeling data also confirmed reports from other groups indicating that the SNc receives robust input from many of the same structures that innervate the VTA, RRF, and PAGvl.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAmygdalaAnimalsDopamineMaleMesencephalonNeural PathwaysRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDopamine

Identifiers

PMID21618227
PMCPMC3174784
OpenAlexW2027252941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.