Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21617643›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2012

The use of mobile robotic telemedicine technology in the neonatal intensive care unit.

A Garingo, P Friedlich, L Tesoriero, S Patil, P Jackson, I Seri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Telemedicine across the continuum of neonatal-perinatal care.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Scope of telemedicine in neonatology.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. US and territory telemedicine policies: identifying gaps in perinatal care.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Telemedicine for genetic and neurologic evaluation in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2014
    Article
  16. Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A GaringoCenter for Fetal and Neonatal Medicine and the USC Division of Neonatal Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
P Friedlich
L Tesoriero
S Patil
P Jackson
I Seri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the use of a wireless, mobile, robotic telecommunications system in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). STUDY

designIn this prospective study utilizing 304 patient encounters on 46 preterm and term neonates in a level IIIa NICU, a bedside neonatologist ('on-site neonatologist'; ONSN) and a neonatologist at a distant location ('off-site neonatologist'; OFFSN) evaluated selected demographic information, laboratory data and clinical and radiological findings of the subjects. The OFFSN used a commercial wireless, mobile, robotic telecommunications system controlled from a remote site. The two physicians were blinded to each other's findings and agreement rates of the evaluations between the ONSN and the OFFSN were compared using kappa statistics. Agreement rates between two ONSNs using the same protocol with 39 patient encounters served as the reference standard. The dependability and timeliness of data transmission were also assessed.

resultExcellent or intermediate-to-good agreements were noted for all but a few physical examination assessments between both the ONSN and OFFSN and the two ONSNs. Poor agreements were found for certain physical examination parameters (breath-, heart- and bowel-sounds and capillary refill time) with or without the use of telemedicine. The median duration of the encounters by the ONSN and OFFSN and the two ONSNs was similar. Five encounters were excluded from the analysis because of technical difficulties. No complications associated with the use of the mobile robot were noted.

conclusionOur findings indicate that the use of mobile robotic telemedicine technology is feasible for neonates in the NICU.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalRoboticsTelemedicineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21617643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.