Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21617465›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2011

The fiber diameter of synthetic bioresorbable extracellular matrix influences human fibroblast morphology and fibronectin matrix assembly.

Henry C Hsia, Mohan R Nair, R Candida Mintz, Siobhan A Corbett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Design Challenges in Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Tissue engineering. Part A · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Using polymeric materials to control stem cell behavior for tissue regeneration.Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henry C HsiaNew Brunswick and Piscataway, N.J. From the Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, and the New Jersey Center for Biomaterials.
Mohan R Nair
R Candida Mintz
Siobhan A Corbett
Johnson University · US

Funding

Translational Research in Regenerative MedicineT32EB005583 · NIBIB · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI LEE, KIBUM, PAREKKADAN, BIJU · 2006 to 2022
$4.7M
The Regulation of Fibronectin Matrix Assembly in Wound HealingR01GM061847 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI CORBETT, SIOBHAN A · 2000 to 2008
$2.7M
Role of wound provisional matrix in endothelial functionK08GM072546 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI HSIA, HENRY C · 2005 to 2009
$688k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB005583NIBIB NIH HHS T32EB005583NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM072546NIGMS NIH HHS K08-GM072546NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061847NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM61847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ideal scaffold material should provide immediate capacity to bear mechanical loads and also permit eventual resorption and replacement with native tissue of similar mechanical integrity. Scaffold characteristics such as fiber diameter provide environmental cues that can influence cell function and differentiation. In this study, the impact of fiber diameter of scaffolds constructed from a tyrosine-based bioresorbable polymer on cellular response was investigated.

methodsElectrospun bioresorbable poly(desamino tyrosyl-tyrosine ethyl ester carbonate) scaffolds composed of microfibers or nanofibers were constructed and seeded with human dermal fibroblasts. The impact of fiber diameter on actin cytoskeletal morphology, focal adhesion size, fibronectin matrix assembly, and cell proliferation was evaluated using immunofluorescent microscopy and computer-assisted image analysis.

resultsActin stress fibers were more easily observed in cells on microfiber scaffolds compared with those on nanofiber scaffolds. Cells on nanofiber scaffolds developed smaller focal adhesion complexes compared with those on microfiber scaffolds (p < 0.0001). The temporal patterns of fibronectin matrix assembly were affected by scaffold fiber diameter, with cells on microfiber scaffolds showing a delayed response in dense fibril formation compared with nanofiber scaffolds. Cells on nanofiber scaffolds showed higher proliferation compared with microfiber scaffolds at time points under 1 week (p < 0.01), but by 2 weeks significantly higher cell proliferation was observed on microfiber scaffolds (p < 0.01).

conclusionsThe fiber diameter of bioresorbable scaffolds can significantly influence cell response and suggests that the ability of scaffolds to elicit consistent biological responses depends on factors beyond scaffold composition. Such findings have important implications for the design of clinically useful engineered constructs.

Indexed as

BiopolymersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAbsorptionBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell ProliferationExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsFibronectinsHumansNanofibersTyrosineBiocompatible MaterialsBiopolymersFibronectinspoly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine-ethyl ester carbonate)Tyrosine

Identifiers

PMID21617465
PMCPMC3103705
OpenAlexW1977942890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.