Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21617135›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2011

Molecular imaging insights into early inflammatory stages of arterial and aortic valve calcification.

Sophie E P New, Elena Aikawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Considerations in the Use of Mouse Models of Vascular and Valvular Calcification.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The role of microRNAs in calcific aortic valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie E P NewCenter for Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Sciences, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Elena Aikawa

Funding

Translational Program of Excellence in NanotechnologyU01HL080731 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WEISSLEDER, MD, PHD, RALPH · 2005 to 2009
$14.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5-U01-HL080731NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL080731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional imaging modalities such as computed tomography, although perfectly adept at identifying and quantifying advanced calcification, cannot detect the early stages of this disorder and offer limited insight into the mechanisms of mineral dysregulation. This review presents optical molecular imaging as a promising tool that simultaneously detects pathobiological processes associated with inflammation and early stages of calcification in vivo at the (sub)cellular levels. Research into treatment of cardiovascular calcification is lacking, as shown by clinical trials that have failed to demonstrate the reduction of calcific aortic stenosis. Hence, the need to elucidate the pathways that contribute to cardiovascular calcification and to develop new therapeutic strategies to prevent or reverse calcification has driven investigations into the use of molecular imaging. This review discusses studies that have used molecular imaging methods to advance knowledge of cardiovascular calcification, focusing in particular on the inflammation-dependent mechanisms of arterial and aortic valve calcification.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisAtherosclerosisCalcinosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, InterventionalVasculitis

Identifiers

PMID21617135
PMCPMC3139950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.