Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21617115›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2011

Specific epidermal growth factor receptor autophosphorylation sites promote mouse colon epithelial cell chemotaxis and restitution.

Toshimitsu Yamaoka, Mark R Frey, Rebecca S Dise, Jessica K Bernard, D Brent Polk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bile acids regulate intestinal cell proliferation by modulating EGFR and FXR signaling.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshimitsu YamaokaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mark R Frey
Rebecca S Dise
Jessica K Bernard
D Brent Polk
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles · USNutrition Sciences (Belgium) · BEVanderbilt University · US

Funding

CYTOKINE REGULATION OF INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL RESTITUTIONR01DK056008 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI POLK, D BRENT · 1999 to 2020
$6.8M
REGULATION OF INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL CELL MIGRATIONR01DK054993 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI POLK, D. BRENT · 2001 to 2005
$1.1M
The role of ErbB-4 in inflammation-induced colon carcinogenesisK01DK077956 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FREY, MARK R · 2007 to 2011
$678k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK077956NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK056008NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK54993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon ligand binding, epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (R) autophosphorylates on COOH-terminal tyrosines, generating docking sites for signaling partners that stimulate proliferation, restitution, and chemotaxis. Specificity for individual EGFR tyrosines in cellular responses has been hypothesized but not well documented. Here we tested the requirement for particular tyrosines, and associated downstream pathways, in mouse colon epithelial cell chemotactic migration. We compared these requirements to those for the phenotypically distinct restitution (wound healing) migration. Wild-type, Y992/1173F, Y1045F, Y1068F, and Y1086F EGFR constructs were expressed in EGFR(-/-) cells; EGF-induced chemotaxis or restitution were determined by Boyden chamber or modified scratch wound assay, respectively. Pharmacological inhibitors of p38, phospholipase C (PLC), Src, MEK, JNK/SAPK, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase), and protein kinase C (PKC) were used to block EGF-stimulated signaling. Pathway activation was determined by immunoblot analysis. Unlike wild-type EGFR, Y992/1173F and Y1086F EGFR did not stimulate colon epithelial cell chemotaxis toward EGF; Y1045F and Y1068F EGFR partially stimulated chemotaxis. Only wild-type EGFR promoted colonocyte restitution. Inhibition of p38, PLC, and Src, or Grb2 knockdown, blocked chemotaxis; JNK, PI 3-kinase, and PKC inhibitors or c-Cbl knockdown blocked restitution but not chemotaxis. All four EGFR mutants stimulated downstream signaling in response to EGF, but Y992/1173F EGFR was partially defective in PLCγ activation whereas both Y1068F and Y1086F EGFR failed to activate Src. We conclude that specific EGFR tyrosines play key roles in determining cellular responses to ligand. Chemotaxis and restitution, which have different migration phenotypes and physiological consequences, have overlapping but not identical EGFR signaling requirements.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell LineChemotaxisColonEpidermal Growth FactorEpithelial CellsErbB ReceptorsGRB2 Adaptor ProteinMiceMutationp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPhospholipase C gammaPhosphorylationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-cblRNA, Small InterferingCBL protein, humanEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsGRB2 Adaptor Proteinp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPhospholipase C gammaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-cblRNA, Small Interferingsrc-Family KinasesTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID21617115
PMCPMC3154598
OpenAlexW1965786619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.