Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21615886›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2011

Cardiac safety of indacaterol in healthy subjects: a randomized, multidose, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel-group thorough QT study.

Sanjeev Khindri, Ronald Sabo, Stuart Harris, Ralph Woessner, Simon Jennings, Anton F Drollmann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of inhaled indacaterol in healthy Chinese volunteers.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2015
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Positioning new pharmacotherapies for COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Role of indacaterol and the newer very long-acting β2-agonists in patients with stable COPD: a review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2013
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Indacaterol (arcapta neohaler) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sanjeev KhindriNovartis Horsham Research Centre, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 5AB, UK. sanjeev.khindri@novartis.com
Ronald Sabo
Stuart Harris
Ralph Woessner
Simon Jennings
Anton F Drollmann
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United Kingdom) · GBNovartis (United States) · USSeaView Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndacaterol is a novel once-daily ultra long-acting β2-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is known that β2-agonists, like other adrenergic compounds, can prolong the QT-interval. This thorough QT/QTc study (as per ICH E14 guideline) evaluated the effect of indacaterol on the QT interval in healthy subjects.

methodsIn this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and positive-controlled (open-label moxifloxacin) study, non-smoking healthy subjects (18-55 years, body mass index: 18.5-32.0 kg/m2) were randomized (4:4:2:4:1) to 14-day treatment with once-daily indacaterol (150 μg, 300 μg, or 600 μg), placebo, or placebo/moxifloxacin (double-blind 14-day treatment with placebo and a single open-label dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on Day 14). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline on Day 14 in QTcF (QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula).

resultsIn total, 404 subjects were randomized to receive indacaterol (150 [n = 108], 300 [n = 108], 600 μg [n = 54]), placebo (n = 107), or placebo/moxifloxacin (n = 27); 388 subjects completed the study. Maximal time-matched mean (90% confidence intervals) treatment differences from placebo in QTcF change from baseline on Day 14 were 2.66 (0.55, 4.77), 2.98 (1.02, 4.93) and 3.34 (0.86, 5.82) ms for indacaterol 150 μg, 300 μg and 600 μg, respectively. Study sensitivity was confirmed with moxifloxacin demonstrating a significant maximal time-matched QTcF prolongation of 13.90 (10.58, 17.22) ms compared to placebo. All indacaterol doses were well tolerated.

conclusionIndacaterol, at doses up to 600 μg once daily (2-4 times the therapeutic dose) does not have any clinically relevant effect on the QT interval.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAza CompoundsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiographyFemaleFluoroquinolonesHeartHumansIndansMaleMiddle AgedMoxifloxacinQuinolinesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesindacaterolIndansMoxifloxacinQuinolinesQuinolones

Identifiers

PMID21615886
PMCPMC3116479
OpenAlexW2030762138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.