ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2012
Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research.
Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2021Pooled it
- The Feasibility and Acceptability to Service Users of CIRCuiTS, a Computerized Cognitive Remediation Therapy Programme for Schizophrenia.Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy · 2016Trial
- Translating one health research evidence into action: co-production of rabies control knowledge in Côte d'Ivoire.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Implementation research in Primary Care (Part 2): How to conduct implementation research?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026Review
- Lane-Petter's Pipeline: Why reliably decreasing animal research takes more than replacements.European journal for philosophy of science · 2026Article
- Capacity-building strategy for next-generation mental health research: embedding a national network infrastructure to grow mental health researcher capabilities and mental health lived-experience research leaders.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers: centering researchers with lived experience in psychiatric neuroscience.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2025Review
- A Review of Reviews of Patient-Reported Measures in Psychosis: Need to Consider Factors Affecting Equity and the Involvement of Patients.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2025Review
- Advancing patient-centered research practices in a pragmatic patient-level randomized clinical trial: A thematic analysis of stakeholder engagement in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA).Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Translational pathology in drug discovery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The impact of patient and public involvement on COVID-19 immunology research: experiences from the UK Coronavirus Immunology Consortium.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Describing the evidence-base for research engagement by health care providers and health care organisations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A co-design living labs philosophy of practice for end-to-end research design to translation with people with lived-experience of mental ill-health and carer/family and kinship groups.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Patient involvement in basic rheumatology research at Nijmegen: a three year's responsive evaluation of added value, pitfalls and conditions for success.BMC rheumatology · 2022Article
- A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022Review
- "I Knew She'd Get It, and Get Me": Participants' Perspectives of a Participatory Autism Research Project.Autism in adulthood · 2022Article
- Translational research in health technologies: A scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ongoing health research: an ad hoc survey among investigators in Germany.BMJ open · 2021Article
- 'A limpet on a ship': Spatio-temporal dynamics of patient and public involvement in research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe paper aims to develop a model of translational research in which service user and other stakeholder involvement are central to each phase.
background'Translational' is the current medical buzzword: translational research has been termed 'bench to bedside' research and promises to fast-track biomedical advances in the service of patient benefit. Models usually conceive of translational research as a 'pipeline' that is divided into phases: the early phase is characterized as the province of basic scientists and laboratory-based clinical researchers; the later phases focus on the implementation, dissemination and diffusion of health applications. If service user involvement is mentioned, it is usually restricted to these later phases.
methodsThe paper critically reviews existing literature on translational research and medicine. The authors develop a theoretical argument that addresses why a reconceptualization of translational research is required on scientific, ethical and pragmatic grounds.
resultsThe authors reconceptualize the model of translational research as an interlocking loop rather than as a pipeline, one in which service user and other stakeholder involvement feed into each of its elements. The authors demonstrate that for the 'interlocking loop' model of translational research to be materialized in practice will require changes in how health research is structured and organized.
conclusionThe authors demonstrate the scientific, ethical and pragmatic benefits of involving service users in every phase of translational research. The authors' reconceptualized model of translational research contributes to theoretical and policy debates regarding both translational research and service user involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.