Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21614513›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2011

Genes that escape from X inactivation.

Joel B Berletch, Fan Yang, Jun Xu, Laura Carrel, Christine M Disteche

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 222 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
222citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

222 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Innate immunity: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joel B BerletchDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Fan Yang
Jun Xu
Laura Carrel
Christine M Disteche
University of Washington · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USTufts University · US

Funding

Mouse X InactivationR01GM046883 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISTECHE, CHRISTINE M. · 1992 to 2018
$5.9M
COMPARATIVE GENOMIC AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF INACTIVE X EXPRESSIONR01HD056452 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CARREL, LAURA · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
X-linked Genes, Histone Modifications, and BehaviorR01MH083949 · NIMH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, JUN · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
DOSAGE COMPENSATION OF THE ACTIVE X CHROMOSOME IN MAMMALSR01GM079537 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISTECHE, CHRISTINE M. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Role of UTX in escape from X inactivationF32HD060402 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERLETCH, JOEL BRADFORD · 2009 to 2010
$68k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD060402NICHD NIH HHS HD056452NICHD NIH HHS HD060402NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056452NIGMS NIH HHS GM046883NIGMS NIH HHS GM079537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046883NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079537NIMH NIH HHS MH083949NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve a balanced gene expression dosage between males (XY) and females (XX), mammals have evolved a compensatory mechanism to randomly inactivate one of the female X chromosomes. Despite this chromosome-wide silencing, a number of genes escape X inactivation: in women about 15% of X-linked genes are bi-allelically expressed and in mice, about 3%. Expression from the inactive X allele varies from a few percent of that from the active allele to near equal expression. While most genes have a stable inactivation pattern, a subset of genes exhibit tissue-specific differences in escape from X inactivation. Escape genes appear to be protected from the repressive chromatin modifications associated with X inactivation. Differences in the identity and distribution of escape genes between species and tissues suggest a role for these genes in the evolution of sex differences in specific phenotypes. The higher expression of escape genes in females than in males implies that they may have female-specific roles and may be responsible for some of the phenotypes observed in X aneuploidy.

Indexed as

AneuploidyBiological EvolutionPhenotypeAnimalsFemaleGene DosageGenes, X-LinkedHumansMaleMiceSex FactorsSpecies SpecificityX Chromosome Inactivation

Identifiers

PMID21614513
PMCPMC3136209
OpenAlexW1982093053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.