Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21614128›Full record

ArticleTropical plant biology2011

Sugarcane (Saccharum X officinarum): A Reference Study for the Regulation of Genetically Modified Cultivars in Brazil.

Adriana Cheavegatti-Gianotto, Hellen Marília Couto de Abreu, Paulo Arruda, João Carlos Bespalhok Filho, William Lee Burnquist, Silvana Creste, Luciana di Ciero, Jesus Aparecido Ferro, Antônio Vargas de Oliveira Figueira, Tarciso de Sousa Filgueiras and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical plant biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The repeatome landscape in the "Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Overview of Spirits Made from Sugarcane Juice.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Yellow Leaf Disease Resistance andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Effect of endophytic diazotrophFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Repetitive Sequence Barcode Probe for Karyotype Analysis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Adriana Cheavegatti-Gianotto
Hellen Marília Couto de Abreu
Paulo Arruda
João Carlos Bespalhok Filho
William Lee Burnquist
Silvana Creste
Luciana di Ciero
Jesus Aparecido Ferro
Antônio Vargas de Oliveira Figueira
Tarciso de Sousa Filgueiras
Mária de Fátima Grossi-de-Sá
Elio Cesar Guzzo
Hermann Paulo Hoffmann
Marcos Guimarães de Andrade Landell
Newton Macedo
Sizuo Matsuoka
Fernando de Castro Reinach
Eduardo Romano
William José da Silva
Márcio de Castro Silva Filho
Eugenio César Ulian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global interest in sugarcane has increased significantly in recent years due to its economic impact on sustainable energy production. Sugarcane breeding and better agronomic practices have contributed to a huge increase in sugarcane yield in the last 30 years. Additional increases in sugarcane yield are expected to result from the use of biotechnology tools in the near future. Genetically modified (GM) sugarcane that incorporates genes to increase resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses could play a major role in achieving this goal. However, to bring GM sugarcane to the market, it is necessary to follow a regulatory process that will evaluate the environmental and health impacts of this crop. The regulatory review process is usually accomplished through a comparison of the biology and composition of the GM cultivar and a non-GM counterpart. This review intends to provide information on non-GM sugarcane biology, genetics, breeding, agronomic management, processing, products and byproducts, as well as the current technologies used to develop GM sugarcane, with the aim of assisting regulators in the decision-making process regarding the commercial release of GM sugarcane cultivars.

Identifiers

PMID21614128
PMCPMC3075403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.