Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21613989›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2011

Predicting adverse drug reactions using publicly available PubChem BioAssay data.

Y Pouliot, A P Chiang, A J Butte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A chronological pharmacovigilance network analytics approach for predicting adverse drug events.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cheminformatics-aided pharmacovigilance: application to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  17. Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y PouliotDivision of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
A P Chiang
A J Butte

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Repositioning drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancerR01GM079719 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079719NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can have severe consequences, and therefore the ability to predict ADRs prior to market introduction of a drug is desirable. Computational approaches applied to preclinical data could be one way to inform drug labeling and marketing with respect to potential ADRs. Based on the premise that some of the molecular actors of ADRs involve interactions that are detectable in large, and increasingly public, compound screening campaigns, we generated logistic regression models that correlate postmarketing ADRs with screening data from the PubChem BioAssay database. These models analyze ADRs at the level of organ systems, using the system organ classes (SOCs). Of the 19 SOCs under consideration, nine were found to be significantly correlated with preclinical screening data. With regard to six of the eight established drugs for which we could retropredict SOC-specific ADRs, prior knowledge was found that supports these predictions. We conclude this paper by predicting that SOC-specific ADRs will be associated with three unapproved or recently introduced drugs.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnimalsDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalData MiningDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsForecastingHumansLogistic ModelsModels, StatisticalProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID21613989
PMCPMC3464971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.