ArticleJournal of virology2011
Genus-specific substitution rate variability among picornaviruses.
Article in Journal of virology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection and Molecular Characterization of Porcine Teschoviruses in India: Identification of New Genotypes.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Genome Sequencing of Historical Encephalomyocarditis Viruses from South Africa Links the Historical 1993/4 Savanna Elephant (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Directed Evolution of Seneca Valley Virus in Tumorsphere and Monolayer Cell Cultures of a Small-Cell Lung Cancer Model.Cancers · 2023Article
- Molecular evolutionary characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 emerging in the United States.Journal of medical virology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Sample Bias and Experimental Artefacts on the Statistical Phylogenetic Analysis of Picornaviruses.Viruses · 2019Article
- Genome wide analysis of the evolution of Senecavirus A from swine clinical material and assembly yard environmental samples.PloS one · 2017Article
- Evolution and phylogeographic dissemination of endemic porcine picornaviruses in Vietnam.Virus evolution · 2016Article
- Article
- Phylodynamic reconstruction of the spatiotemporal transmission and demographic history of coxsackievirus B2.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Species-specific transmission of novel picornaviruses in lemurs.Journal of virology · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
- Cell tropism predicts long-term nucleotide substitution rates of mammalian RNA viruses.PLoS pathogens · 2014Article
- One misdated sequence of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus prevents accurate estimation of its nucleotide substitution rate.BMC evolutionary biology · 2012Article
- Partitioning the genetic diversity of a virus family: approach and evaluation through a case study of picornaviruses.Journal of virology · 2012Article
- Molecular epidemiology and evolution of human enterovirus serotype 68 in Thailand, 2006-2011.PloS one · 2012Article
- Characterization of a canine homolog of human Aichivirus.Journal of virology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Picornaviruses have some of the highest nucleotide substitution rates among viruses, but there have been no comparisons of evolutionary rates within this broad family. We combined our own Bayesian coalescent analyses of VP1 regions from four picornaviruses with 22 published VP1 rates to produce the first within-family meta-analysis of viral evolutionary rates. Similarly, we compared our rate estimates for the RNA polymerase 3D(pol) gene from five viruses to four published 3D(pol) rates. Both a structural and a nonstructural gene show that enteroviruses are evolving, on average, a half order of magnitude faster than members of other genera within the Picornaviridae family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.