Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21613353›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2011

Gender, sex-steroid, and secretagogue-selective recovery from growth hormone-induced feedback in older women and men.

Johannes D Veldhuis, Dana Erickson, Jean Wigham, Sue Weist, John M Miles, Cyril Y Bowers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Regulated recovery of pulsatile growth hormone secretion from negative feedback: a preclinical investigation.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes D VeldhuisEndocrine Research Unit, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education Center for Translational Science Activities, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. veldhuis.johannes@mayo.edu
Dana Erickson
Jean Wigham
Sue Weist
John M Miles
Cyril Y Bowers
Mayo Clinic · USTulane University · US

Funding

MAYO CLINIC CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE ACTIVITIESUL1RR024150 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$66.4M
Obesity and Energy Metabolism CoreP30DK050456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CROW, SCOTT J · 1995 to 2015
$17.0M
Age-Dependent Estrogen-Independent Mechanism of Hyposomatotropism in WomenR01AG029362 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VELDHUIS, JOHANNES D · 2007 to 2016
$4.0M
ACTIONS OF TESTOSTERONE ON THE AGING MALE GH AXISR37AG019695 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI VELDHUIS, JOHANNES D · 2001 to 2011
$3.2M
Actions of Testosterone on the Aging Male GH AxisR01AG019695 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VELDHUIS, JOHANNES D · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL 1 RR024150NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024150NIA NIH HHS AG019695NIA NIH HHS AG029362NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019695NIA NIH HHS R01 AG029362NIA NIH HHS R37 AG019695NIDDK NIH HHS DK50456NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextGH negatively regulates its own secretion. How gender, sex steroids, and secretagogues modulate GH autofeedback is not known. HYPOTHESIS/

objectiveSupplementation with sex steroids and/or a peptidyl secretagogue will enhance the escape of GH from autoinhibition, thus framing a mechanism for amplifying pulsatile GH secretion. SUBJECTS AND

settingTen healthy postmenopausal women and 10 comparably aged men participated at the Clinical-Translational Science Unit. DESIGN/

interventionsRandomly ordered, double-blind, prospective crossover treatment with placebo vs. testosterone (men) or placebo vs. estradiol (women). Autofeedback was imposed by an iv pulse of GH. Recovery of feedback inhibition was quantified during constant infusion of saline, GHRH, or GH-releasing peptide-2 (three peptide categories). OUTCOMES/

resultsDuring negative feedback, total (integrated) GH recovery depended upon gender (P = 0.017), sex hormone (P < 0.001), and peptide category (P < 0.001). Mechanistic analysis revealed that feedback-suppressed nadir GH concentrations were determined by sex-steroid treatment (P = 0.018) but not by gender (P = 0.444). Peak GH escape was controlled by both treatment (P = 0.004) and gender (P = 0.003). Nadir GH and peak GH during feedback were enhanced by GHRH or GHRP-2 (P < 0.001 for both). Gender × peptide (P = 0.012 for nadir GH), treatment × peptide (P < 0.001 total and peak GH), and gender × treatment (P = 0.017 nadir GH) regulated GH recovery interactively.

conclusionGender, sex-steroid supplementation, and secretagogue type confer distinct feedback-rescuing effects, introducing a new level of complexity in the control of pulsatile GH regulation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAndrogensCross-Over StudiesDrug SynergismEstradiolFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleGrowth Hormone-Releasing HormoneHomeostasisHuman Growth HormoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligopeptidesPlacebosAndrogensEstradiolGrowth Hormone-Releasing Hormonegrowth hormone-releasing peptide-2Human Growth HormoneOligopeptidesPlacebosTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID21613353
PMCPMC3146792
OpenAlexW1970570380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.