Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21612633›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2011

Asking the right questions: developing evidence-based strategies for treating HIV in women and children.

Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Anchilla Banegura, Pedro Cahn, Celia D C Christie, Robert Dintruff, Manuel Distel, Catherine Hankins, Nicholas Hellmann, Elly Katabira, Sandra Lehrman and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sexual and reproductive health and human rights of women living with HIV.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 9 countries.

Quarraisha Abdool KarimDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Anchilla Banegura
Pedro Cahn
Celia D C Christie
Robert Dintruff
Manuel Distel
Catherine Hankins
Nicholas Hellmann
Elly Katabira
Sandra Lehrman
Julio Montaner
Scott Purdon
James F Rooney
Robin Wood
Shirin Heidari
Abbott Fund · USAIDS Vancouver · CABoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEColumbia University · USDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · USFundación Huésped · ARGilead Sciences (United States) · USInternational AIDS Society · CHJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS · CHMakerere University · UGMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity of the West Indies · JMViiV Healthcare (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In July 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued formal revisions of its guidelines on the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV. The new guidelines greatly expand eligibility for treatment of adults and children, as well as for pregnant women seeking prophylaxis for vertical HIV transmission. WHO's new recommendations bring the guidelines closer to practices in developed countries, and its shift to earlier treatment alone will increase the number of treatment-eligible people by 50% or more.Scaling up access to HIV treatment is revealing important gaps in our understanding of how best to provide for all those in need. This knowledge gap is especially significant in developing countries, where women and children comprise a majority of those living with HIV infection. Given the magnitude and significance of these populations, the International AIDS Society, through its Industry Liaison Forum, prioritized HIV treatment and prophylaxis of women and children. In March 2010, the International AIDS Society and 15 partners launched a Consensus Statement outlining priority areas in which a relative lack of knowledge impedes delivery of optimal prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) and treatment to women and children.The Consensus Statement, "Asking the Right Questions: Advancing an HIV Research Agenda for Women and Children", makes a special appeal for a more gender-sensitive approach to HIV research at all stages, from conception to design and implementation. It particularly emphasizes research to enhance the understanding of sex-based differences and paediatric needs in treatment uptake and response. In addition to clinical issues, the statement focuses on programmatic research that facilitates access and adherence to antiretroviral regimens. Better coordination of HIV management with sexual and reproductive healthcare delivery is one such approach.We discuss here our knowledge gaps concerning effective, safe PMTCT and treatment for women and children in light of the expansion envisioned by WHO's revised guidelines. The guideline's new goals present an opportunity for advancing the women and children's agenda outlined in the Consensus Statement.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsConsensusFemaleFetusGuidelines as TopicHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID21612633
PMCPMC3118247
OpenAlexW2008932425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.