Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21612607›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2011

Homoplastic microinversions and the avian tree of life.

Edward L Braun, Rebecca T Kimball, Kin-Lan Han, Naomi R Iuhasz-Velez, Amber J Bonilla, Jena L Chojnowski, Jordan V Smith, Rauri Ck Bowie, Michael J Braun, Shannon J Hackett and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Landscape of Micro-Inversions Provide Clues for Population Genetic Analysis of Humans.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Edward L BraunDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. ebraun68@ufl.edu
Rebecca T Kimball
Kin-Lan Han
Naomi R Iuhasz-Velez
Amber J Bonilla
Jena L Chojnowski
Jordan V Smith
Rauri Ck Bowie
Michael J Braun
Shannon J Hackett
John Harshman
Christopher J Huddleston
Ben D Marks
Kathleen J Miglia
William S Moore
Sushma Reddy
Frederick H Sheldon
Christopher C Witt
Tamaki Yuri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroinversions are cytologically undetectable inversions of DNA sequences that accumulate slowly in genomes. Like many other rare genomic changes (RGCs), microinversions are thought to be virtually homoplasy-free evolutionary characters, suggesting that they may be very useful for difficult phylogenetic problems such as the avian tree of life. However, few detailed surveys of these genomic rearrangements have been conducted, making it difficult to assess this hypothesis or understand the impact of microinversions upon genome evolution.

resultsWe surveyed non-coding sequence data from a recent avian phylogenetic study and found substantially more microinversions than expected based upon prior information about vertebrate inversion rates, although this is likely due to underestimation of these rates in previous studies. Most microinversions were lineage-specific or united well-accepted groups. However, some homoplastic microinversions were evident among the informative characters. Hemiplasy, which reflects differences between gene trees and the species tree, did not explain the observed homoplasy. Two specific loci were microinversion hotspots, with high numbers of inversions that included both the homoplastic as well as some overlapping microinversions. Neither stem-loop structures nor detectable sequence motifs were associated with microinversions in the hotspots.

conclusionsMicroinversions can provide valuable phylogenetic information, although power analysis indicates that large amounts of sequence data will be necessary to identify enough inversions (and similar RGCs) to resolve short branches in the tree of life. Moreover, microinversions are not perfect characters and should be interpreted with caution, just as with any other character type. Independent of their use for phylogenetic analyses, microinversions are important because they have the potential to complicate alignment of non-coding sequences. Despite their low rate of accumulation, they have clearly contributed to genome evolution, suggesting that active identification of microinversions will prove useful in future phylogenomic studies.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionAnimalsBase SequenceBirdsEvolution, MolecularGenetic LociGenomeMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID21612607
PMCPMC3123225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.