Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21612353›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)2011

Sexual dimorphism in ischemic stroke: lessons from the laboratory.

Bharti Manwani, Louise D McCullough

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A narrative review of vagus nerve stimulation in stroke.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Role ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bharti ManwaniDepartment of Neurology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Louise D McCullough
Hartford Hospital · US

Funding

Gender Differences in Ischemic Cell DeathR01NS055215 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCCULLOUGH, LOUISE D. · 2007 to 2016
$4.3M
Effect of Chromosomal Sex on Stroke SensitivityR21NS066406 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI MCCULLOUGH, LOUISE D. · 2010 to 2011
$418k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055215NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS066406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is emerging as a major health problem for elderly women. Women have lower stroke incidence than men until an advanced age, when the epidemiology of ischemic stroke shifts and incidence rises dramatically in women. Experimental models of rodent stroke have replicated this clinical epidemiology, with exacerbated injury in older compared with young female rodents. Many of the detrimental effects of aging on ischemic stroke outcome in females can be replicated by ovariectomy, suggesting that hormones such as estrogen play a neuroprotective role. However, emerging data suggest that the molecular mechanisms leading to ischemic cell death differ in the two sexes, and these effects may be independent of circulating hormone levels. This article highlights recent clinical and experimental literature on sex differences in stroke outcomes and mechanisms.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeAgingAnimalsBrainEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHormonesHumansMaleMicePostmenopauseRadiographySex FactorsFibrinolytic AgentsHormones

Identifiers

PMID21612353
PMCPMC3128473
OpenAlexW2118430003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.