ReviewAnalytical chemistry2011
Landscape of next-generation sequencing technologies.
Review in Analytical chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of the conventional and novel methods in testing EGFR variants for NSCLC patients in the last 10 years through different regions: a systematic review.Molecular biology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Research on the application of nanopore sequencing technology in investigating microbial data deviation.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- The Genome Survey Analysis of Female and MaleGenes · 2025Article
- Composite Mapping for Peptide-Based Data Storage with Higher Coding Density and Fewer Synthesis Cycles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Whole-Genome Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a review of current methods, databases, softwares, and analytical tools.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- The gut microbiome: an emerging epicenter of antimicrobial resistance?Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Machine learning empowered next generation DNA sequencing: perspective and prospectus.Chemical science · 2024Review
- Polyploids of Brassicaceae: Genomic Insights and Assembly Strategies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Storage-D: A user-friendly platform that enables practical and personalized DNA data storage.iMeta · 2024Article
- Quantifying transcriptome diversity: a review.Briefings in functional genomics · 2024Review
- Optical nanomaterial-based detection of biomarkers in liquid biopsy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- A dual-rule encoding DNA storage system using chaotic mapping to control GC content.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Review
- Linking plant functional genes to rhizosphere microbes: a review.Plant biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Full-Length Transcriptome of the Great Himalayan Leaf-Nosed Bats (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Highly reliable and efficient encoding systems for hexadecimal polypeptide-based data storage.Fundamental research · 2023Article
- Characterization of somatic structural variations in 528 Chinese individuals with Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Gut Microbiota in Nutrition and Health with a Special Focus on Specific Bacterial Clusters.Cells · 2022Review
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.