ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
[Global health research challenges with a North-South partnership].
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and strategies in care delivery for type 1 diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The ethical and validity conundrum in epilepsy research in LMIC settings.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.Global health, science and practice · 2022Review
- Assessing how global health partnerships function: an equity-informed critical interpretive synthesis.Globalization and health · 2021Review
- Contemporary issues in north-south health research partnerships: perspectives of health research stakeholders in Zambia.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- It's time to address sexual violence in academic global health.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Deconstructing the notion of "global health research partnerships" across Northern and African contexts.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- A Global Health Research Checklist for clinicians.International journal of emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Knowledge sharing in global health research - the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Making a commitment to ethics in global health research partnerships: a practical tool to support ethical practice.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2015Article
- A mixed methods contribution to the study of health public policies: complementarities and difficulties.BMC health services research · 2015Review
- Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries.BMC medical ethics · 2014Article
- Ethical considerations related to participation and partnership: an investigation of stakeholders' perceptions of an action-research project on user fee removal for the poorest in Burkina Faso.BMC medical ethics · 2014Article
- Partnership research on nutrition transition and chronic diseases in West Africa - trends, outcomes and impacts.BMC international health and human rights · 2011Article
- Implementation research for strengthening health systems in India.The Indian journal of medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGlobal health research often involves North-South partnerships. However, these types of partnerships present particular challenges. The aim of this study is to examine these challenges from the perspectives of those involved in order to formulate ideas for further discussion and action to support the training of young researchers.
methodsThis is a qualitative study using an exploratory design. The data are taken from encounters with 41 persons in individual in-depth interviews (n = 16) and a focus group (n = 25). All encounters were audio-recorded and transcribed, and the content subsequently underwent thematic analysis.
resultsThe challenges identified were related to communication problems, power relationships, research priorities, differences in research culture, the institutional environment and researchers' careers. The researchers describe the conditions that support equitable partnerships and propose some ideas for the training of young researchers.
interpretationTo foster equitable and sustainable partnerships, the researchers suggest that the next generation would be better trained by focusing particularly on interactive discussions, field work, mentoring and the adoption of a reflective and self-critical mindset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21612053PMC6973999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.