ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2011
FDG-PET for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer: Advances and current limitations.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world evidence in a large cohort comparing FAPI and FDG PET/CT for hepatopancreatobiliary cancer diagnosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical Impact ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Efficacy of contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT in patients awaiting liver transplantation with rising alpha-fetoprotein after bridge therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.European radiology · 2018Article
- Multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experience.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2018Article
- Clinical usefulness of FDG-PET in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing surgical resection.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2017Article
- Advancement in treatment and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with radiopharmaceuticals.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016Review
- Site-specifically labeled CA19.9-targeted immunoconjugates for the PET, NIRF, and multimodal PET/NIRF imaging of pancreatic cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, assessment of resectability and metabolic response of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Applying PET to broaden the diagnostic utility of the clinically validated CA19.9 serum biomarker for oncology.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2013Article
- [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation as a biological marker of hypoxic status but not glucose transport ability in gastric cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2013Article
- Imaging heterogeneity in the mitochondrial redox state of premalignant pancreas in the pancreas-specific PTEN-null transgenic mouse model.Biomarker research · 2013Article
- Article
- Pancreatic Cancer in High-Income Asia-Pacific: A Population-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Challenges of Pancreatic Cancer.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Japan, the use of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for some malignant tumors came to be covered by the National Health Insurance in 2002. In 2010, the health insurance coverage was expanded to all types of malignant tumors. However, since PET examination requires a large amount of capital investment, facilities at which PET is available are still limited. On the other hand, PET equipment has rapidly been introduced in large hospitals and in the diagnostic imaging centers of major cities during the past few years. Although numerous middle-sized and small hospitals cannot afford to perform PET, physicians can refer their patients to facilities where PET is available. Therefore, it is essential for general physicians to gain accurate knowledge on PET, including the appropriate indications for PET, in order to select patients for referral to PET facilities. PET is not always a useful tool, especially for lesions of the pancreas and hepatobiliary system, which is the main topic of this review. The indications of PET for lesions in these organs vary depending on the purpose of the examination. In this article, we review the indications for PET (or PET/computed tomography [CT]) using FDG of the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.