ArticleBiomedical imaging and intervention journal2008
Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison.
Article in Biomedical imaging and intervention journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimated health outcomes of breast cancer screening in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program by race/ethnicity.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Automated classification of fat-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes on screening mammograms.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Rapid Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Breast Cancer Based on Raman Spectroscopy of Serum Combined with Convolutional Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Breast cancer diagnosis using frequency decomposition of surface motion of actuated breast tissue.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Analysing the Insights and Assessing the Impact of a Digital Mammography and Tomosynthesis Based 2-year Long Prospective Breast Screening Programme Organised in Western India.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- Breast Arterial Calcification: A Potential Biomarker for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021Review
- Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology AloneAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.