ArticlePLoS biology2011
Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
Article in PLoS biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mathematical Model for Chemo-Mechanically Induced Collective Cell Motility on Planar Elastic Substrates.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Investigating local negative feedback of Rac activity by mathematical models and cell-motility simulations.iScience · 2026Article
- Emergent eukaryotic directional sensing via receptor degradation and diffusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Perspective on Interdisciplinary Approaches on Chemotaxis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Review
- Spatial distribution of cytoskeleton-mediated feedback controls cell polarization: A computational study.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Complementary cytoskeletal feedback loops control signal transduction excitability and cell polarity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Persistent pseudopod splitting is an effective chemotaxis strategy in shallow gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Spatial distribution of cytoskeleton-mediated feedback controls cell polarization: a computational study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A minimal physical model for curvotaxis driven by curved protein complexes at the cell's leading edge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Three-component contour dynamics model to simulate and analyze amoeboid cell motility in two dimensions.PloS one · 2024Article
- Local negative feedback of Rac activity at the leading edge underlies a pilot pseudopod-like program for amoeboid cell guidance.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Interpreting T-cell search "strategies" in the light of evolution under constraints.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Biophysical models of early mammalian embryogenesis.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Anomalous diffusion and asymmetric tempering memory in neutrophil chemotaxis.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Comparative mapping of crawling-cell morphodynamics in deep learning-based feature space.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Local actin dynamics couple speed and persistence in a cellular Potts model of cell migration.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Selection of established tumour cells through narrow diameter micropores enriches for elevated Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK MAPK signalling and enhanced tumour growth.Small GTPases · 2021Article
- Three-dimensional stochastic simulation of chemoattractant-mediated excitability in cells.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanism of eukaryotic chemotaxis remains unclear despite intensive study. The most frequently described mechanism acts through attractants causing actin polymerization, in turn leading to pseudopod formation and cell movement. We recently proposed an alternative mechanism, supported by several lines of data, in which pseudopods are made by a self-generated cycle. If chemoattractants are present, they modulate the cycle rather than directly causing actin polymerization. The aim of this work is to test the explanatory and predictive powers of such pseudopod-based models to predict the complex behaviour of cells in chemotaxis. We have now tested the effectiveness of this mechanism using a computational model of cell movement and chemotaxis based on pseudopod autocatalysis. The model reproduces a surprisingly wide range of existing data about cell movement and chemotaxis. It simulates cell polarization and persistence without stimuli and selection of accurate pseudopods when chemoattractant gradients are present. It predicts both bias of pseudopod position in low chemoattractant gradients and--unexpectedly--lateral pseudopod initiation in high gradients. To test the predictive ability of the model, we looked for untested and novel predictions. One prediction from the model is that the angle between successive pseudopods at the front of the cell will increase in proportion to the difference between the cell's direction and the direction of the gradient. We measured the angles between pseudopods in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells under different conditions and found the results agreed with the model extremely well. Our model and data together suggest that in rapidly moving cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils an intrinsic pseudopod cycle lies at the heart of cell motility. This implies that the mechanism behind chemotaxis relies on modification of intrinsic pseudopod behaviour, more than generation of new pseudopods or actin polymerization by chemoattractants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.